Filter by Date
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
MEERA SANTOSH PAL AND ORS Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

Appeal (Civil), 17 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jan 16, 2017

The crucial consideration in the present case is whether the right to bodily integrity calls for a permission to allow her to terminate her pregnancy. The report of the Medical Board clearly warrants the inference that the continuance of the pregnancy involves the risk to the life of the pregnant woman and a possible grave injury to her physical or mental health as required by Section 3 (2)(i) of Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Vs. K.P. SINGH AND ANR.

Appeal (Civil), 3798 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jan 12, 2017

Full Judgment

Tags: Service Law / Matter

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
UNITED FINANCE CORPORATION Vs. M.S.M. HANEEFA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.

Appeal (Civil), 4204 of 2007, Judgment Date: Jan 11, 2017

Full Judgment

Tags: Civil Procedure

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
SALONI ARORA Vs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Appeal (Crl.), 64 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jan 10, 2017

As rightly pointed out by the learned counsel for the parties on the strength of law laid down by this Court in the case of Daulat Ram vs. State of Punjab, (AIR 1962 SC 1206) that in order to prosecute an accused for an offence punishable under Section 182 IPC, it is mandatory to follow the procedure prescribed under Section 195 of the Code else such action is rendered Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
SRI GANESH Vs. STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.

Appeal (Crl.), 39 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2017

“Age determination inquiry” contemplated under Section 7-A of the Act read with Rule 12 of the 2007 Rules enables the court to seek evidence and in that process, the court can obtain the matriculation or equivalent certificates, if available. Only in the absence of any matriculation or equivalent certificates, the court needs to obtain the date of birth certificate from the Full Judgment

Tags: Interpretation Rape Sexual Offences

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
BEHRAM TEJANI & ORS Vs. AZEEM JAGANI

Appeal (Civil), 150 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2017

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
MD. SAJJAD @ RAJU @ SALIM Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Appeal (Crl.), 1953 of 2010, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2017

The identification parade itself was held 25 days after the arrest. Their chance meeting was also in the night without there being any special occasion for them to notice the features of any of the accused which would then register in their minds so as to enable them to identify them on a future date. The chance meeting was also for few Full Judgment

Tags: Acquittal Murder

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
AJAY SINGH AND ANR AND ETC. Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND ANR

Appeal (Crl.), 32-33 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2017

Performance of judicial duty in the manner prescribed by law is fundamental to the concept of rule of law in a democratic State. It has been quite often said and, rightly so, that the judiciary is the protector and preserver of rule of law. Effective functioning of the said sacrosanct duty has been entrusted to the judiciary and that entrustment expects the courts to conduct Full Judgment

Tags: Acquittal Dowry Death Interpretation

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
THE STATE OF TELANGANA Vs. HABIB ABDULLAH JEELANI & ORS.

Appeal (Crl.), 1144 of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2017

The seminal issue that arises for consideration in this appeal, by special leave, is whether the High Court while refusing to exercise inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) to interfere in an application for quashment of the investigation, can restrain the investigating agency not to arrest the accused persons during the course of investigation. There Full Judgment

Tags: Interpretation Quashing Of Criminal Proceedings

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
COMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. M/S.UNITED SPIRITS LTD.& ANR.

Appeal (Civil), 5003 of 2006, Judgment Date: Jan 05, 2017

In view of the aforesaid analysis, we are constrained to remit the matter to the tribunal for reconsideration of the aforesaid aspects on the basis of observations made hereinabove and the law in the field. However, we may proceed to state that we have not expressed anything on the merits of the case including the imposition of penalty and interest. We expect the tribunal shall advert to each Full Judgment

Tags: Tax/ Tax Settlement

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
SECRETARY MAHATAMA GANDHI MISSION & ARN. Vs. BHARTIYA KAMGAR SENA AND ORS

Appeal (Civil), 115-116 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jan 05, 2017

Full Judgment

Tags: Service Law / Matter

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SECRETARY, LAND & BUILDING DEPARTMENT & ANR. Vs. GAUTAM CHOPRA & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 4790, 4942, 8077, Judgment Date: Jan 05, 2017

Full Judgment

Tags: Land Acquisition

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
GAUTAM JAIN Vs. U.O.I.& ANR.

Appeal (Crl.), 2281 of 2014, Judgment Date: Jan 04, 2017

This provision commands communication of the grounds on which the order of detention has been passed and to afford him the earliest opportunity of making a representation against the order. In the instant case, the documents containing the statement of Pooran Chand Sharma were not given and for this very reason, the High Court rightly held that such a ground cannot be relied upon by the respondents in support Full Judgment

Tags: Preventive Detention

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
GOPAL AND SONS (HUF) Vs. CIT KOLKATA-XI

Appeal (Civil), 12274 of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 04, 2017

Full Judgment

Tags: Interpretation Income Tax

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
M/S PATEL BROTHERS Vs. STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 49-50 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jan 04, 2017

Full Judgment

Tags: Tax/ Tax Settlement

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
VIJENDRA SINGH Vs. STATE OF U.P.

Appeal (Crl.), 1448 of 2010, Judgment Date: Jan 04, 2017

Full Judgment

Tags: Murder

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
H.V.P.N LTD & ORS Vs. BAL GOVIND

Appeal (Civil), 94 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jan 04, 2017

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Vs. ABDUL ALI AND ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 95 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jan 04, 2017

Full Judgment

Tags: Land Acquisition

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
KAVITHA PAVAN TIBILE Vs. PAVAN H TIBILE

Appeal (Civil), 92=93 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jan 04, 2017

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
PEPSU ROAD TPT CORPN, PATIALA Vs. AMANDEEP SINGH & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 3842 of 2011, Judgment Date: Jan 03, 2017

In view of the above, it is well settled that the notice inviting option need not to be personally served to the employees unless the Regulation or any instruction so provides. From the facts of the present case it is clear that although Regulations were in force from 1992, plaintiff retired on 30th November, 2011 and after retirement received CPF benefits without any protest and Full Judgment

Tags: Pension