Judgments
AP MAHESH COOPERATIVE URBAN BANK SHAREHOLDERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION VERSUS RAMESH KUMAR BUNG AND ORS.
Kamleshwar Dixit vs. State of M.P. and others
Law laid down - 1) Section 3 - NSA Act, 1980- The facts situation and “pressures of the day” are relevant factors for examining the validity of a detention order. In a pandemic-like situation, one incident of black marketing of an essential drug can be sufficient to invoke the detention law. 2) Detention order – Indisputably, para 4 of the detention order is erroneously pasted from elsewhere. There is no basis of the said para – The Doctrine of Severability was applied Full Judgment
UNION OF INDIA VERSUS RAJENDRA N SHAH & ANR.
THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, NATIONAL HIGHWAYS NO.45 E AND 220 VERSUS M. HAKEEM & ANR.
Sayyed Ayaz Ali Versus Prakash G Goyal & Ors.
AJOY KHANDERIA VERSUS BARCLAYS BANK & ANR
Shobha Kant Mishra Vs. The Union of India
KUMER SINGH Versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.
The Sub Area Manager South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. Versus Shri Anam and Ors
JVL ELECTRONICS, THANJAVUR VERSUS SAMSUNG INDIA ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD.
SNAPDEAL PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS M/S FUTURETIMES TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.
Nagendra Singh and another Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Law laid down - As per context of Clause 16(8) of Food Control Order, 2015, Collector is not appellate authority as he is exercising original jurisdiction to form opinion for lodging of prosecution. Full Judgment
Ravi Shanker Chouksey Vs. The State of M.P. and others
Law laid down - Writ of quo warranto can be issued to control executive action in making appointment to public offices. Public office must be office in which public is interested and of substantive importance and character. Writ of quo warranto cannot be issued for employees holding Class III and Class IV position. Full Judgment