Filter by Date
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
ANURAG KUMAR SINGH & ORS. Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 8334 of 2013, Judgment Date: Oct 05, 2016

It is significant that the Rules refer to the recruitment year. It is a well-accepted principle of service law that only the number of vacancies that are advertised can be filled up. If the advertisement gives liberty to the Government to vary the number of posts, such power cannot be exercised for filling up future vacancies. If additional posts were created during the recruitment year i.e. Full Judgment

Tags: Advertisement Appointment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
COMMON CAUSE Vs. UNION OF INDIA

Writ Petition (Civil), 13 of 2003, Judgment Date: May 13, 2015

23. The legitimate and permissible object of an advertisement, as earlier discussed, can always be achieved without publication of the photograph of any particular functionary either in the State of a political party. We are, therefore, of the view that in departure to the views of the Committee which recommended permissibility of publication of the photographs of the President and Prime Minister of the country and Governor or Chief Full Judgment

Tags: Interpretation Advertisement