Filter by Date
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
AMARSANG NATHAJI AS HIMSELF AND AS KARTA AND MANAGER Vs. HARDIK HARSHADBHAI PATEL AND ORS

Appeal (Civil), 11120 of 2016, Judgment Date: Nov 23, 2016

The mere fact that a person has made a contradictory statement in a judicial proceeding is not by itself always sufficient to justify a prosecution under Sections 199 and 200 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) (hereinafter referred to as “the IPC”); but it must be shown that the defendant has intentionally given a false statement Full Judgment

Tags: Complaint Case Interpretation

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
S.R.SUKUMAR Vs. S.SUNAAD RAGHURAM

Appeal (Crl.), 844 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 02, 2015

7. Upon consideration of the rival contentions and materials on record, the points falling for determination are: (i) in the facts of the case, when did the Magistrate take cognizance of the complaint for the first time i.e. on 18.05.2007 or on 21.06.2007, when the Magistrate satisfied of a prima Full Judgment

Tags: Complaint Case Cognizance

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Udai Shankar Awasthi Vs State of U.P. & Anr.

Appeal (Crl.), 61 of 2013, Judgment Date: Jan 09, 2013

CONTINUING OFFENCE: 10. Section 472 Cr.P.C. provides that in case of a continuing offence, a fresh period of limitation begins to run at every moment of the time period during which the offence continues. The expression, ‘continuing offence’ has not been defined in the Cr.P.C. because Full Judgment

Tags: Complaint Case Quashing Of Criminal Proceedings