Filter by Date
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
SHRI KISHAN CHAND DASS & ORS. Vs KUONI TRAVEL (INDIA) PRIVATE LTD.

FAO(OS), 31 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 02, 2016

Full Judgment

Tags: CPC

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
O.P.VERMA Vs. SHAHMAL & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 8176 of 2016, Judgment Date: Aug 17, 2016

Full Judgment

Tags: CPC

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
DAYA SAH & ORS. Vs. CHANDRA DATT PANDE & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 4747-4749 of 2009, Judgment Date: Oct 07, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags: CPC Civil Procedure

Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
DHARAMBIR SINGH Vs M/S HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LTD. AND ORS

LPA, 590 of 2009, Judgment Date: Sep 15, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags: CPC

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
KIRPAL KAUR Vs. JITENDER PAL SINGH & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 2820 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 14, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags: CPC

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
Smt. Premwati Devi Vs. State Of U.P. & Another

WRIT - A, 1716 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 04, 2015

Having considered the aforesaid submissions, this court finds that the application to withdraw the suit in appeal has been filed under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC, which was rightly held to be not maintainable as there was no compromise between the parties. Even otherwise, the suit has been dismissed on merits and also applications for amendment have been rejected.  Full Judgment

Tags: CPC

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
JYOTI LIMITED AND OTHERS Vs. BHARAT J. PATEL & OTHERS

Appeal (Civil), 2935-36 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 17, 2015

The maintainability of a suit is question of law. Though, by virtue of declaration under Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, all suits of civil nature are maintainable unless barred either by an express provision or by implication of law. We are of the opinion that the directions in paras 7.2 and 7.3 are inconsistent with the directions in para 7.4. Apart from Full Judgment

Tags: Company Law CPC Maintenability Injunction

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
M/S SHERALI KHAN MOHAMED MANEKIA Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 2475-2476 of 2015, Judgment Date: Feb 27, 2015

The short question, therefore, that falls for consideration is as to whether after the disposal of the appeal, the Court Receiver stands discharged or whether he continues in his office till an order of discharge is passed by the Court? In our view, when a Receiver is appointed pending suit or appeal, the prime objective is to preserve the property by taking possession Full Judgment

Tags: CPC Receiver

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
SHYAM LAL Vs. DEEPA DASS CHELA RAM CHELA GARIB DASS

Appeal (Civil), 4245 of 2012, Judgment Date: Feb 27, 2015

The question that arises for consideration is as to whether the plaintiff-appellant became a trespasser after expiry of the lease period or continued to be a tenant having protection for eviction under the tenancy laws. Taking into consideration the various tenancy laws applicable in the State of Punjab and the law discussed by this Court and the High Court, in our considered opinion the trial court, the appellate court Full Judgment

Tags: CPC Eviction Injunction Tenancy

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
PETROMARINE PRODUCTS LTD. Vs. OCEAN MARINE SERVICES CO. LTD. & ANR

Appeal (Civil), 6156 of 2005, Judgment Date: Feb 17, 2015

It has not been disputed by the appellant that the Bombay High Court while passing the order of attachment was not aware about the fact that the vessel was seized by the Madras High Court much prior to the filing of the suit by the appellant in Bombay High Court. The Division Bench in the impugned order has recorded the finding that Madras High Full Judgment

Tags: CPC