Filter by Date
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Dr. Pawan Tamrakar and another vs. M.P. Special Police Establishment & others

WRIT PETITION, 7496 of 2021, Judgment Date: Jun 08, 2021

Law laid down -  1. Law relating to clubbing of FIRs - There can be no straightjacket formula for consolidating or clubbing the FIR and Courts are required to examine the facts of each case. A second FIR in respect of same offence or different offences committed in the course of same transaction is not permissible. The second FIR on the basis of receipt of information in respect of same cognizable offence or the same occurrence or incident giving rise one Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

MS SHIVANI & ANR VERSUS THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS

W.P.(CRL), 515 of 2021, Judgment Date: May 25, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

RAM KISHAN VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.

Appeal (Crl.), 393 of 2021, Judgment Date: Apr 09, 2021

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Rajendra Singh Pawar and others Vs. State of M.P. and others

WRIT PETITION, 18878 of 2020, Judgment Date: Dec 24, 2020

Law laid down - Police Officer shall enter complaint in General Diary as per M. P. Police Regulation 634. Give number of entry to complainant. If cognizable offence is disclosed First Information Report shall be registered. If preliminary inquiry is required then same shall be completed within 15 days. In cases of delay after giving reasons preliminary inquiry shall be completed within 42 days and result shall be communicated to complainant. In case of failure to complete preliminary inquiry in 42 Full Judgment

Chhatisgarh High Court (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

Dhananjay Kumar Versus State Of Chhattisgarh

WPCR->WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL [ OTHER MATTER ], 121 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jan 30, 2020

Prospective accused has no right of hearing before registration of FIR and investigation by the police officer or before the Court including the writ Court, therefore, in a writ petition seeking direction for registration of FIR and investigation into a cognizable offence, the prospective accused is neither necessary nor a proper party. Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

MANJARI BAKSHI VERSUS STATE & ORS

W.P.(CRL), 482 of 2019, Judgment Date: Dec 23, 2019

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

Vinubhai Haribhai Malaviya and Ors. Versus The State of Gujarat and Anr.

Appeal (Crl.), 478-479 of 2017, Judgment Date: Oct 16, 2019

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

R.L. Jatav Vs. Station House Officer

CRR, 714 of 2017, Judgment Date: May 15, 2018

Law Laid Down - A trial court while rendering a judgment in trial is empowered to direct the police to register an offence against one of the witnesses against whom the trial court while marshalling the evidence finds prima facie material of committing cognizable offence. By doing so, the trial court would not be overstepping its jurisdictional purview as the provision of Section 154 Cr.P.C. obliges the police to register an FIR on receipt of information of commission of cognizable offence from Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Dr. M.R. (Mohan Ramuji) Deshmukh Vs. State of M.P. and others

WRIT PETITION, 2751 of 2017, Judgment Date: Apr 28, 2017

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SANJIV RAJENDRA BHATT Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Writ Petition (Civil), 135 of 2011, Judgment Date: Oct 13, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India ()

Sonu Gupta Versus Deepak Gupta & Ors.

Appeal (Crl.), 285-287 of 2015, Judgment Date: Feb 11, 2015

-At the stage of cognizance and summoning the Magistrate is required to apply his judicial mind only with a view to take cognizance of the offence, or, in other words, to find out whether prima facie case has been made out for summoning the accused persons. At this stage, the learned Magistrate is not required to consider the defence version or materials or Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Anju Chaudhary Vs. State of U.P. & Anr.

Appeal (Crl.), 2039 of 2012, Judgment Date: Dec 13, 2012

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Jetha Bhaya Odedara Versus Ganga Maldebhai Odedara and Anr. Respondents

Special Leave Petition (Crl.), 4010 of 2011, Judgment Date: Dec 16, 2011

Full Judgment