Filter by Date
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF MEGHALAYA VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

Original Suite, 1 of 2021, Judgment Date: May 11, 2023

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Bar Association and Anr. Versus Union of India and Anr.

Writ Petition (Civil), 433 of 2012, Judgment Date: May 18, 2022

Full Judgment

Patna High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Laxmikant Sharma and Ors Vs. The State Of Bihar and Ors

Civil Writ, 14267, 15188 of 2014, Judgment Date: Nov 30, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

UNION OF INDIA VERSUS RAJENDRA N SHAH & ANR.

Appeal (Civil), 9108-9109 of 2014, Judgment Date: Jul 20, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

SMALL SCALE INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION (REGD.) Versus Union of India and others

Writ Petition (Civil), 476 of 2020, Judgment Date: Mar 23, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

VIKAS KISHANRAO GAWALI VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

Writ Petition (Civil), 980 of 2019, Judgment Date: Mar 04, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

PARMAR SAMANTSINH UMEDSINH VS. STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 706 of 2021, Judgment Date: Feb 24, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

GAJENDRA SHARMA VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

Writ Petition (Civil), 825 of 2020, Judgment Date: Nov 27, 2020

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Sk. Md. Rafique VERSUS Managing Committee, Contai Rahamania High Madrasah and Others

Appeal (Civil), 5808 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2020

Full Judgment

Gauhati High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S BHAWANI TEA INDUSTRIES VS STATE OF ASSAM & ORS

WP(C), 3816 of 2001, Judgment Date: May 02, 2017

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

VISHAL PURI Vs. UNION OF INDIA

W.P.(C), 11416 of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 11, 2017

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

VIVEK NARAYAN SHARMA Vs. UNION OF INDIA

Writ Petition (Civil), 906 of 2016, Judgment Date: Dec 16, 2016

Whether the notification dated 8th November 2016 is ultra vires Section 26(2) and Sections 7,17,23,24,29 and 42 of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934; Does the notification contravene the provisions of Article 300(A) of the Constitution; Assuming that the notification has been validly issued under the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 whether it is ultra vires Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution; Whether the limit on withdrawal of Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Satyendra Pal Singh V/s State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy.,Revenue And Others

MISC. BENCH, 17141 of 2016, Judgment Date: Jul 26, 2016

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

R.M DHARIWAL 100% EOU Vs. U.O.I & ORS

Writ Petition (Civil), 471 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 18, 2016

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

R.B. Rai vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

WRIT PETITION, 1942 of 2011, Judgment Date: Apr 30, 2016

27. Thus, taking overall view of the matter, the existing provision relating to reservation, backlog vacancies, carryforward of backlog vacancies and the operation of roster, contained in the Rules of 2002 runs contrary to the constitutional provisions contained in clause (4A) and (4B) of Article 16 and Article 335 of the Constitution and the law predicated in M. Nagaraj (supra), are declared ultra vires and non-est in law. 28. Consequently, various promotions of SCs/STs category made on the basis of these Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

WIPRO LTD. Vs. ASST. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 9766-9775 of 2003, Judgment Date: Apr 16, 2015

2) The subject matter of those writ petitions/writ appeals was the constitutional validity of proviso (II-i) of Rule 9(2) of the Customs Valuation (Determination of Price of Imported Goods) Rules, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the "Valuation Rules"). 36) We are, therefore, of the opinion that impugned amendment, namely, proviso Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SHREYA SINGHAL VERSUS UNION OF INDIA

Writ Petition (Crl.), 167 of 2012, Judgment Date: Mar 24, 2015

This batch of writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India raises very important and far-reaching questions relatable primarily to the fundamental right of free speech and expression guaranteed by Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India. The immediate cause for concern in these petitions is Section 66A of the Information Technology Act of 2000. 119. Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

S.T. SADIQ Vs. STATE OF KERALA & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 3962 of 2007, Judgment Date: Feb 04, 2015

It is well-settled that if a statute requires an authority to exercise power, when such authority is satisfied that conditions exist for exercise of that power, the satisfaction has to be based on the existence of grounds mentioned in the statute. The grounds must be made out on the basis of the relevant material. If the existence of the conditions required for the exercise of the power is challenged, the courts Full Judgment