Judgments - Workmen
MAHANADI COALFIELDS LTD. VERSUS BRAJRAJNAGAR COAL MINES WORKERS’ UNION
U.P. SINGH VERSUS PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
Bharatiya Kamgar Karmachari Mahasangh Versus M/s. Jet Airways Ltd.
Their Workmen through the Joint Secretary (Welfare), Food Corporation of India Executive Staff Union. Versus Employer in relation to the Management of the Food Corporation of India
The ESI Corporation Versus M/s. Radhika Theatre
BATA INDIA LIMITED VERSUS WORKMEN OF BATA INDIA LIMITED AND ANOTHER
Novartis India Limited Vs. Vipin Shrivastava & others
Law Laid Down - The supervisory capacity necessarily has to be examined keeping in view the manual, unskilled, skilled, clerical work and the person performing such work is a “workman”. Meeting different professionals to promote sale of product of Pharmaceutical Company cannot be said to be manual or clerical work done by the Medical Representatives as it requires knowledge of product, its uses and also persuasive skills. May be, the Medical Representative does not supervise any person but he is the Full Judgment
STATE OF ASSAM VS UPEN DAS & 835 ORS
VICE CHANCELLOR LUKNOW UNIVERSITY Vs. AKHILESH KUMAR KHARE &ANR
SURENDRA KUMAR & ORS Vs. GREATER NOIDA IND. DEVELOPMENT AUTH.&ORS
The main issue that arises for consideration is whether the policy decision extending the benefit of regularisation to contractual employees against 60% vacant posts will be deemed to regularise the services of the appellants from the retrospective date, that is, 20.11.2002, when the said posts were first advertised. The appellants were Full Judgment
PREM RAM Vs. M.D. UTTARAKHAND PEY JAL & NIRM.NIGM&ORS
If engagement in a work- charged establishment rest on a criterion, no better than the absolute discretion of the authority engaging them or the fortuitous circumstances of a vacancy or need in a work-charged establishment, then, there is indeed no difference between a daily-wager on the one hand and work-charged employees on the other. No distinction can resultantly be Full Judgment
Devraj Gupta Vs State of Chhattisgarh
GAURI SHANKER Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Whether the Labour Court was justified in not awarding backwages and granting Rs.2,500/- as compensation in lieu of backwages though it has awarded reinstatement in the absence of gainful employment of workman? Whether the High Court in exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227, is justified in interfering with the finding of facts recorded on the points of dispute recorded by the Labour Full Judgment
UMRALA GRAM PANCHAYAT Vs. THE SEC.MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEE UNION & ORS
They have also been working for similar number of hours, however, the discrepancy in the payment of wages/salary between the permanent and the non-permanent workmen is alarming and the same has to be construed as being an unfair labour practice as defined under Section 2(ra) of the ID Act r/w Entry No.10 of the Fifth Schedule to the ID Act, which is prohibited under Section 25(T) of the ID Full Judgment