Judgments - Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007
Vikram Singh Gurjar vs. Union of India and Ors
AIR COMMODORE NAVEEN JAIN VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. VERSUS SANDEEP KUMAR ETC.
EX. LAC YOGESH PATHANIA Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
SQN. LDR. (RETD.) NAVTEJ SINGH VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
N.N. GODFRED & OTHERS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
EX. GNR LAXMANRAM POONIA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Vs. LT COL P.K. CHOUDHARY AND ORS.
MALATI SARDAR Vs. NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
The question for consideration thus is whether the Tribunal at Kolkata had the jurisdiction to decide the claim application under Section 166 of the Act when the accident took place outside Kolkata jurisdiction and the claimant also resided outside Kolkata jurisdiction, but the respondent being a juristic person carried on business at Kolkata. Further question is whether in absence of Full Judgment
VEERENNDRA KUMAR DUBEY Vs. CHIEF OF ARMY STAFF & ORS
The first and foremost is an unequivocal declaration that mere award of four red ink entries to an individual does not make his discharge mandatory. This implies that four red ink entries is not some kind of laxman rekha, which if crossed would by itself render the individual concerned undesirable or unworthy of retention in the force. Award of four red ink entries simply pushes the individual concerned into a grey area where Full Judgment