Judgments - Award
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Chandigarh Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. Versus State of Punjab & Anr.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
CHANABASAPPA VERSUS KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAM LTD. & ANR.
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
M/S. DYNA TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. VERSUS M/S. CROMPTON GREAVES LTD.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Sri Chanappa Nagappa Muchalagoda versus Divisional Manager, New India Insurance Company Limited
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CENTRAL COTTAGE INDUSTRIES CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. VERSUS RADHEY SHYAM
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
NARESH KUMAR & ORS. VERSUS GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
M/S. CANARA NIDHI LIMITED VERSUS M. SHASHIKALA AND OTHERS
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
GENERAL MANAGER, ELECTRICAL RENGALI HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT, ORISSA AND OTHERS VERSUS SRI GIRIDHARI SAHU AND OTHERS
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
M/S SHAHI AND ASSOCIATES VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR VERSUS GOPAL DAS (DECEASED) THROUGH LRs & ORS
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
SITAC PVT. LTD. VERSUS BANWARI LAL SONS PVT LTD & ORS
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Balwant Singh (D) through LRs. Gurbinder Singh Versus The State of Haryana & Others Etc. Etc.
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
Central Board of Trustees Versus Smt. Eravati
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
MMTC LTD. Versus M/S VEDANTA LTD.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
State of Uttarakhand & Anr VERSUS Raj Kumar
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Management of the Barara Cooperative MarketingcumProcessing Society Ltd Versus Workman Pratap Singh
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
M/s S.V.E.C. Construction Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & others
Law Laid Down - The question whether time is essence of contract or not, depends upon the intention of the parties. Here, the petitioner sought modification of work order so as to complete it within the time granted and then himself chose todetermine the contract. Thus, he understood that the time was essence of the contract. Such conduct of the petitioner as well as on behalf of the respondents shows that the parties intended to complete the contract within time frame. Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
South Eastern Coalfields Limited Versus . Col. J.P.S. Yadav, Managing Director
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Sudarsan Puhan VERSUS Jayanta Ku. Mohanty & Ors
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)