Filter by Date
Supreme Court of India (Constitution Bench- Five Judge)

High Court Bar Association, Allahabad versus State of U.P.

Appeal (Crl.), 3589 of 2023, Judgment Date: Feb 29, 2024

Full Judgment

Tags Charge PC Act
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE THROUGH INSPECTOR OF POLICE CBI CHENNAI VS. NARESH PRASAD AGARWAL

Appeal (Crl.), 829-830 of 2024, Judgment Date: Feb 13, 2024

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Central Bureau of Investigation versus Narottam Dhakad

Appeal (Crl.), 2592 of 2023, Judgment Date: Aug 25, 2023

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Deepak Garg Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh

MCRC, 33397 of 2021, Judgment Date: Jan 19, 2023

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

IC 56663X COL ANIL KUMAR GUPTA VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 8968 of 2019, Judgment Date: Nov 07, 2022

Full Judgment

Tags Charge
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

VIJAY RAJMOHAN VERSUS STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CBI, ACB, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU

Appeal (Crl.), -- of 2022, Judgment Date: Oct 11, 2022

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

KANCHAN KUMAR VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR

Appeal (Crl.), 1562 of 2022, Judgment Date: Sep 14, 2022

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Ku. Shiva Bhadoriya Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh

Criminal Appeal, 6664 of 2021, Judgment Date: Sep 12, 2022

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE BY DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE VERSUS R. SOUNDIRARASU ETC.

Appeal (Crl.), 1452 – 1453 of 2022, Judgment Date: Sep 05, 2022

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

P. VIJAY NATARAJ & ORS. VERSUS STATE & ANR.

Appeal (Crl.), 1448 of 2022, Judgment Date: Sep 05, 2022

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

PUSHPENDRA KUMAR SINHA VERSUS STATE OF JHARKHAND

Appeal (Crl.), 1333 of 2022, Judgment Date: Aug 24, 2022

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M.P. Poorv Kshetra Vidyut Vitaranj Company Ltd. Versus K.K. Mishra

WA, 72 of 2022, Judgment Date: May 02, 2022

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

J.B.S. Chandel Vs. State of M.P.

MCRC, 14484 of 2012, Judgment Date: Jan 14, 2022

Law laid down -  The object of giving protection under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure-- To take sanction for initiating prosecution against public servant for protecting them from needless harassment so as to render protective assurance to honest officer to perform public duty honestly and to best of their abilities because threat of prosecution demoralises the honest officer. Real test to determine applicability of Section 197 of Cr.C.P. and obtaining sanction from the Government are:- (i) That the accused must be a Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Naresh Vs. State of M.P

CRR, 2791 of 2021, Judgment Date: Dec 13, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

THE STATE BY S.P. THROUGH THE SPE CBI VERSUS UTTAMCHAND BOHRA

Appeal (Civil), 1590 of 2021, Judgment Date: Dec 09, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

THWAHA FASAL VERSUS UNION OF INDIA

Appeal (Crl.), 1302 of 2021, Judgment Date: Oct 28, 2021

Full Judgment

Tags Charge
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Tarun Kumar Mishra Versus State of M.P. & Ors.

WRIT PETITION, 14649 of 2021, Judgment Date: Oct 21, 2021

Law laid down - As per the provisions of Rule 14 of MP Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1966, the disciplinary authority has to apply its mind separately at two different stages, (i) initiation of proceeding and (ii) approval of charge-sheet. It is not enough that if the disciplinary authority has formed an opinion to initiate the disciplinary proceeding and signed it, but for issuance of charge-sheet it would not be required to sign it by the disciplinary authority. Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Rajendra Kumar Gautam Vs. State of MP

MCRC, 3139, 2603 of 2021, Judgment Date: Sep 28, 2021

Law laid down -  1. Departmental inquiry and FIR/Criminal case based on same facts/incident – In every case, it cannot be said as a rule of thumb that exoneration in departmental enquiry on merits must result into setting aside of FIR. If it is found on merits that there is no contravention of the provision of the Act in the departmental inquiry, the continuance of trial of person concerned can be treated as an abuse of the process of the Court. 2. Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

NATIONAL GANDHI MUSEUM VS. SUDHIR SHARMA

Appeal (Civil), 8215-8216 of 2011, Judgment Date: Sep 24, 2021

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

SAURABH SHARMA VERSUS SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (EAST) & ORS

W.P.(C), 6595 of 2020, Judgment Date: Apr 07, 2021

A vehicle which is moving across the city, even if occupied at a given point in time by one person, would be a public place owing to the immediate risk of exposure to other persons under varying circumstances. Thus, a vehicle even if occupied by only one person would constitute a ‘public place’ and wearing of a mask therein, would be compulsory. The wearing of a mask or a face cover in a vehicle, which may be occupied by either Full Judgment

Tags Charge