Judgments - Company Law
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Union of India and Another Versus Deloitte Haskins and Sells LLP & Anr.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
AUTHUM INVESTMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED VERSUS R.K. MOHATTA FAMILY TRUST AND OTHERS
Tags Company Law
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
IFB AGRO INDUSTRIES LIMITED VERSUS SICGIL INDIA LIMITED AND OTHERS
Tags Company Law
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
NIRENDRA NATH KAR VERSUS GOPAL NAVIN BHAI DAVE & ORS.
Tags Company Law
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED VERSUS SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA & ORS.
Tags Company Law
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Serious Fraud Investigation Office and Others Versus Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited and Others
Tags Company Law
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
BALRAM GARG VERSUS SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
INDIA AWAKE FOR TRANSPARENCY VERSUS UNION OF INDIA REP. BY SECRETARY MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS AND ANR
Tags Company Law
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
M/s. NEW VICTORIA MILLS & ORS. Versus SHRIKANT ARYA
Tags Company Law
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
K.N. RAJAKUMAR VERSUS V. NAGARAJAN & ORS.
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
TATA CAPITAL FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. VERSUS RUCHIKA AUTOLINKS PRIVATE LTD.
Tags Company Law
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED VERSUS CYRUS INVESTMENTS PVT. LTD. AND ORS.
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Rapid MetroRail Gurgaon Limited Etc. Versus Haryana Mass Rapid Transport Corporation Limited & Ors.
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
UPENDRA KISHAN KACHRU & ANR VERSUS UPENDRA KISHAN KACHRU & ANR
Tags Company Law
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
NARESH DAYAL & ORS VERSUS THE DELHI GYMKHANA CLUB LTD. & ORS
Tags Company Law
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
Sasan Power Limited, Singrauli versus Madhya Pradesh Micro and Small Enterprise Facilitation Council & another
Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 -Section 17 and 18- the reference to the Council- the provision is beneficent in nature and, therefore, must be given wide construction. The respondent No.2’s reference was rightly entertained by the Council. More so, when objections (Annexure P/6 & P/10) filed by the petitioner regarding jurisdiction of council is not pregnant with a factual objection regarding non filing of memorandum by respondent No.2 under Section 8 of the Act. Section 18 of Micro, Small Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
ACTION ISPAT AND POWER PVT. LTD. VERSUS SHYAM METALICS AND ENERGY LTD.
Tags Company Law
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
M/s Embassy Property Developments Pvt. Ltd. Versus State of Karnataka & Ors.
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India Limited Through Authorised Signatory Versus Satish Kumar Gupta & Ors.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Jaiprakash Associates Ltd & Anr. Versus IDBI Bank Ltd. & Anr.
Tags Company Law