Filter by Date
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Brihan Karan Sugar Syndicate Private Limited versus Yashwantrao Mohite Krushna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana

Appeal (Civil), 2768 of 2023, Judgment Date: Sep 14, 2023

Full Judgment

Tags Copyright
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/s Knit Pro International Versus The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Appeal (Crl.), 807 of 2022, Judgment Date: May 20, 2022

Full Judgment

Tags Copyright
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SHYAM SEL AND POWER LIMITED AND ANOTHER VERSUS SHYAM STEEL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Appeal (Civil), 1984 of 2022, Judgment Date: Mar 14, 2022

Full Judgment

Tags Copyright
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

RENAISSANCE HOTEL HOLDINGS INC. VERSUS B. VIJAYA SAI AND OTHERS

Appeal (Civil), 404 of 2022, Judgment Date: Jan 19, 2022

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

SHRI RISHI RAJ VERSUS SAREGAMA INDIA LTD.

CS(COMM), 403 of 2017, Judgment Date: Nov 09, 2021

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC VERSUS SUMIT PANDEY AND OTHERS

CS(COMM), 240 of 2021, Judgment Date: Nov 09, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Saregama India Limited Versus Next Radio Limited & Ors

Appeal (Civil), 5985-5987 of 2021, Judgment Date: Sep 27, 2021

Full Judgment

Tags Copyright
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

COLORBAR COSMETICS PVT. LTD. VERSUS DEEPAK JAIN & ORS

CS(COMM), 574 of 2020, Judgment Date: Sep 22, 2021

Full Judgment

Patna High Court (Single Judge)

Shiva Poly Tubes Pvt. Ltd. and Ors Vs. State Of Bihar and Anr

Criminal Miscellaneous, 737 of 2018, Judgment Date: Sep 20, 2021

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Curewin Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. vs. Curewin Hylico Pharma Pvt. Ltd.

MA, 1269 of 2021, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2021

Law laid down - 1) Section 12-A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 - The provision is clear and unambiguous that a suit which is not pregnant with any such interim relief under the act cannot be instituted unless the plaintiff exhausts the remedy of pre-institutional mediation (para no.11). 2) Section 12-A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 - The purpose of insertion of section 12-A is to encourage the parties to try and resolve their disputes amicably in mediation process. But Commercial Court Full Judgment

Tags Copyright
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

SHANMUGAM VERSUS STATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TAMIL NADU

Appeal (Crl.), 900 of 2010, Judgment Date: Apr 06, 2021

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

JAGMOHAN RATRA VERSUS AMPA CYCLES PVT. LTD. & ANR

CS(COMM), 569 of 2020, Judgment Date: Mar 17, 2021

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

KENT RO SYSTEMS LTD. & ANR VERSUS JAIDEEP KISHNANI & ORS

CS(COMM), 84 of 2021, Judgment Date: Mar 09, 2021

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

NATURES ESSENCE PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS PROTOGREEN RETAIL SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED & OR

CS(COMM), 581 of 2020, Judgment Date: Mar 09, 2021

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/s.Mold Tek Packing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. S.D.Containers

CS, 1 of 2021, Judgment Date: Feb 27, 2021

Law laid down -  Section 22 (4) of the Designs Act, 2000 – Civil Suit – Civil Suit is directed to be decided by Indore Bench of High Court by judgment of Supreme Court dated December 01, 2020. The parties have taken diametrically opposite view as to which bench can try the said civil suit. The plaintiff urged that civil suit needs to be decided by a commercial appellate division constituted u/S.5 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 whereas other side Full Judgment

Tags Copyright
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Praveen Muraka S/o Shri Gokuldas Murarka vs. Bhama Enterprises India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

MA, 2488 of 2020, Judgment Date: Feb 16, 2021

Law laid down -  The Designs Act, 2000 – It seeks to provide and ensure effective protection to registered designs. It is also required to promote design activity in order to promote the “design element” in an article of production. Section 4 of Designs Act- A plaintiff can institute a suit impugning the other product if the said product is neither new nor significantly distinguishable. Section 4 of Designs Act – The test to examine whether the impugned product is 'new or original', Full Judgment

Tags Copyright
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

THE INDIAN PERFORMING RIGHT SOCIETY LTD. VERSUS ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK (INDIA) LTD.

CS(OS), 666 of 2006, Judgment Date: Jan 04, 2021

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

KULWINDER SINGH & ORS VERSUS STATE & ANR

CRL.M.C., 476 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jan 08, 2020

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

GIANT ROCKET MEDIA AND ENTERTAINMENT PVT LTD VERSUS PRIYANKA GHATAK AND ORS.

CS(COMM), 736 of 2019, Judgment Date: Jan 07, 2020

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

BENNETT, COLEMAN & COMPANY LTD. & ANR VERSUS MR. MANOJ USDADIYA & ORS

CS(COMM), 224 of 2019, Judgment Date: Dec 02, 2019

Full Judgment

Tags Copyright