Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
MAT.APP.(F.C.), 72
of 2020, Judgment Date: May 01, 2020
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
MAT.APP.(F.C.), 65
of 2020, Judgment Date: May 01, 2020
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
MAT.APP.(F.C.), 73
of 2020, Judgment Date: May 01, 2020
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
MAT.APP.(F.C.), 47
of 2020, Judgment Date: May 01, 2020
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 417-418
of 2020, Judgment Date: Apr 29, 2020
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 19121913
of 2020, Judgment Date: Mar 03, 2020
The position of law is well settled that neither the High Court in the limited scope available to it in a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code is entitled to reappreciate the evidence nor this Court.
Questions raised does not qualify as substantial questions of law when the manner in which the parties had proceeded before the Trial Court is noticed. The questions framed in fact provides scope for reappreciation of the evidence and not as Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
MAT.APP.(F.C.), 29
of 2020, Judgment Date: Feb 27, 2020
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
W.P.(CRL), 504
of 2020, Judgment Date: Feb 19, 2020
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 1670
of 2020, Judgment Date: Feb 18, 2020
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CRL.REV.P., 716
of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 13, 2020
Full Judgment
Patna High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Miscellaneous Appeal, 713
of 2018, Judgment Date: Feb 03, 2020
Gunjesh Narayan Versus Anjali Kumari Full Judgment
Patna High Court (Single Judge)
Miscellaneous Appeal, 726
of 2017, Judgment Date: Jan 10, 2020
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 9318
of 2014, Judgment Date: Dec 17, 2019
The fact, however,remains that the relationship appears to have deteriorated to such an extent that both parties see little good in each other, an aspect supported by the counselor’s report; though the respondent insists that she wants to stay with the appellant. In our view, this insistence is only to somehow not let a decree of divorce be passed against the respondent. This is only to frustrate the endeavour of the appellant to get a decree of divorce,completely losing sight Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
MAT.APP.(F.C.), 293
of 2019, Judgment Date: Dec 03, 2019
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
MAT.APP.(F.C.), 48
of 2017, Judgment Date: Nov 27, 2019
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
MP, 2400
of 2019, Judgment Date: Nov 20, 2019
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
MAT.APP., 239
of 2018, Judgment Date: Nov 20, 2019
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
MAT.APP., 185
of 2018, Judgment Date: Nov 20, 2019
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
MAT.APP.(F.C.), 214
of 2018, Judgment Date: Nov 20, 2019
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
MAT.APP.(F.C.), 207
of 2019, Judgment Date: Oct 15, 2019
Full Judgment
