Judgments - Forgery and Cheating
JARNAIL SINGH VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.
BABU VENKATESH AND OTHERS VERSUS STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANOTHER
Serious Fraud Investigation Office Versus Rahul Modi & Ors.
Smt. Rekha Jain and Anr. Versus The State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK & ORS. Versus OM PRAKASH LAL SRIVASTAVA
Gurupreet Singh Vs. State of MP and Anr.
DEVAS MULTIMEDIA PRIVATE LTD. Versus ANTRIX CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.
Manoj Parmar vs. Union of India and others
Law laid down - Held: 1. Section 407 of Cr.P.C. is an assurance of fair trial. 2. A litigant cannot choose a Bench of his choice. It is only an exceptional circumstances, where the existence of “bias” or “likelihood of bias” when apparent on the facts and circumstances of the case, the High Court can invoke its discretionary power under Section 407 of Cr.P.C. In the absence of an allegation of “pre-existing bias”, the power of transfer of a case should normally Full Judgment
ANITA RANI Versus ASHOK KUMAR & ORS.
Shiv Kumar Singh and another Vs. State of M.P.
Law laid down - For the purpose of invoking the provisions of Section 65 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the conditions of Section 63 has to be satisfied first then only secondary evidence can be allowed. Full Judgment
N. Raghavender VERSUS State of Andhra Pradesh, CBI
The State of M. P. vs. Sanjay
Law laid down - Where the minimum sentence is less than 10 years but the maximum sentence is not death or life imprisonment then Section 167 (2) (a) (ii) will apply and the accused will be entitled to grant of “default bail” after 60 days in case charge-sheet is not filed. In view of the same, since the maximum sentence provided u/s.467 of IPC is life imprisonment, regardless that the minimum sentence is less then 10 years, the period of filing Full Judgment