Filter by Date
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Karan Singh Vs. State of M.P.

Criminal Appeal, 262 of 2002, Judgment Date: Jun 30, 2021

Law laid down - 1 (i) Whether the sentence of life imprisonment awarded to the appellant means actual sentence of 14 years or 20 years ? Ans: Section 53 of the IPC provides for sentence of imprisonment of life and the definition of life as contained in Section 45 makes it clear that life means the life of human being till he breath his last. A sentence for imprisonment of life will run for the entire life of the convict unless the Full Judgment

Tags Rape Sentence
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Sunil Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh

Criminal Revision, 853 of 2021, Judgment Date: Jun 25, 2021

Full Judgment

Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)

ABC Versus State Of Chhattisgarh

WPC, 2294 of 2021, Judgment Date: Jun 25, 2021

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Prosecutrix (Minor) through her Natural Guardian Vs. State of M.P. and others

WRIT PETITION, 5321 of 2021, Judgment Date: Jun 23, 2021

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Raju @ Vijay s/o Daulji Ahirwar V/s State of M.P & one another

Criminal Appeal, 5475 of 2020, Judgment Date: Jun 10, 2021

Law laid down -  The procedure prescribed under section 94 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 is to be adopted by the committee or board but where the accused claiming himself to be "Child in conflict with law" is produced before the Magistrate or Sessions Court empowered under Cr.P.C.to conduct trail and an objection is raised about juvenility at the time of commission of offence, the procedure prescribed under section 9 (2) of the JJ Act, Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Vishal Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh

MCRC, 17991 of 2021, Judgment Date: May 04, 2021

Law laid down -  Exception 2 of Section 375 of IPC is irrational. Marriageable age in India is 18 years, giving consent for sexual intercourse is also 18 years. Exception is inconsistent with the provisions of POCSO Act. Definition of “Child” as per Section 2(1)(d) is below 18 years. The preamble also provides that “sexual exploitation and sexual abuse of children are heinous crimes and need to be effectively addressed” This is directly in conflict with Exception 2 of Section 375 of IPC. Section Full Judgment

Tags Bail Rape
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

MR. VIVEK KUMAR YADAV VERSUS STATE & ANR

CRL.M.C., 1034 of 2021, Judgment Date: Apr 28, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Patan Jamal Vali Versus The State of Andhra Pradesh

Appeal (Crl.), 452 of 2021, Judgment Date: Apr 27, 2021

Full Judgment

Tags Rape
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

AMEET KHANDELWAL VERSUS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

BAIL APPLN., 1162 of 2021, Judgment Date: Apr 23, 2021

Full Judgment

Tags Bail Rape
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Pramod Yadav Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh and others

Criminal Appeal, 5189 of 2020, Judgment Date: Apr 22, 2021

Full Judgment

Tags Bail Rape
Patna High Court (Single Judge)

Deepak Mahto Versus The State Of Bihar

Criminal Appeal, 2932 of 2019, Judgment Date: Apr 12, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

YOGESH VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA

Appeal (Crl.), 1306 of 2017, Judgment Date: Apr 06, 2021

Full Judgment

Tags Murder Rape
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

K.Prakash & Anr. vs. The State of Karnataka

Appeal (Crl.), 336 of 2021, Judgment Date: Mar 19, 2021

Full Judgment

Patna High Court (Single Judge)

Md. Javed @ Md. Javed Mian Vsersus The State Of Bihar

Criminal Appeal, 1448 of 2018, Judgment Date: Mar 12, 2021

Full Judgment

Patna High Court (Single Judge)

Sekh Magan @ Md. S. K. Magan Versus The State Of Bihar

Criminal Appeal, 912 of 2017, Judgment Date: Mar 12, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Sonu @ Subhash Kumar Versus State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.

Appeal (Crl.), 233 of 2021, Judgment Date: Mar 01, 2021

Full Judgment

Tags Rape
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

VIKAS MITTAL VERSUS THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR

BAIL APPLN., 4114 of 2020, Judgment Date: Feb 17, 2021

Full Judgment

Patna High Court (Single Judge)

Sunny Deol Versus The State Of Bihar

Criminal Appeal, 798 of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 12, 2021

Full Judgment

Tags Rape Appeal
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Ratanlal Vs. State Of Madhya Pradesh

Criminal Appeal, 333 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jan 28, 2021

Law laid down -  [1] Presumption under Section 114- A of Evidence Act is not available in case of gang rape provided under Section 376-D of IPC after the amendment incorporated in Section 376(2) of IPC and in Section 114-A of Evidence Act by the Act 13 of 2013 dated 03.02.2013 for offences committed after 03.02.2013. [2] Oversight of the legislature cannot be amended or corrected by the Courts. Full Judgment

Tags Rape
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

REKHA VERSUS THE STATE (N.C.T.) OF DELHI

CRL.A., 518 of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 25, 2021

Full Judgment