Filter by Date
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SOLOMON SELVARAJ & ORS. Versus INDIRANI BHAGAWAN SINGH & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 8885 of 2022, Judgment Date: Dec 02, 2022

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SATHYANATH & ANR. VERSUS SAROJAMANI

Appeal (Civil), 3680 of 2022, Judgment Date: May 06, 2022

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

The Jamia Masjid Versus Sri K V Rudrappa (Since Dead) By Lrs. & Ors.

Appeal (Civil), 10946 of 2014, Judgment Date: Sep 23, 2021

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

BLACK DIAMOND TRACKPARTS PVT. LTD. & ORS VERSUS BLACK DIAMOND MOTORS PVT. LTD.

CM(M), 132 of 2021, Judgment Date: Aug 10, 2021

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF TELEMATICS VERSUS RAJIV BHASIN & ANR

LPA, 141 of 2021, Judgment Date: Apr 12, 2021

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Smt. Kusum Bai & Ors Vs Smt. Vimla Devi (dead) & Ors

MA, 995 of 2011, Judgment Date: Jul 03, 2019

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

PRAMOD KUMAR & ANR. VERSUS ZALAK SINGH & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 1055 of 2019, Judgment Date: May 10, 2019

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

ASGAR & ORS VERSUS MOHAN VARMA & ORS

Appeal (Civil), 1500 of 2019, Judgment Date: Feb 05, 2019

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

CANARA BANK VERSUS N.G. SUBBARAYA SETTY & ANR.

Appeal (Civil), 4233 of 2018, Judgment Date: Apr 20, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Sucha Singh Sodhi (D) Thr. LRs. Versus Baldev Raj Walia & Anr.

Appeal (Civil), 3777 of 2018, Judgment Date: Apr 13, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

ANDANUR KALAMMA AND ORS. :Versus: GANGAMMA (DEAD) BY L.RS.

Appeal (Civil), 423-424 of 2018, Judgment Date: Mar 06, 2018

Full Judgment

Chhatisgarh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Hari Sinha Versus Gurupad Sambhav Ram

FA->FIRST APPEAL, 104 of 2010, Judgment Date: Nov 08, 2017

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

DHARMENDRA KUMAR Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

W.P.(C), 7054 of 2016, Judgment Date: May 31, 2017

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S KAUSHIK COOP.BUILDING SOCIETY Vs. N.PARVATHAMMA & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 5113 of 2017, Judgment Date: Apr 11, 2017

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

R K ROJA Vs. U S RAYUDU & ANR

Appeal (Civil), 5540 of 2016, Judgment Date: Jul 04, 2016

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

MACHHALI UDYOG SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT Vs. STATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS.

WRIT PETITION, 3583 of 2013, Judgment Date: Jun 13, 2016

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SATYENDRA KUMAR & ORS Vs. RAJ NATH DUBEY & ORS

Appeal (Civil), 4083-4084 of 2016, Judgment Date: May 06, 2016

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Smt. Kanchan Khattar Vs. Rakesh Dardwanshi and others

CR, 74 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jan 20, 2016

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Raveesh Chand Jain Raveesh versus Raj Rani Jain

Appeal (Civil), 1822 of 2015, Judgment Date: Feb 12, 2015

- The bare perusal of the aforesaid provision makes it clear that it confers wide discretion on the court to pass a judgment at any stage of the suit on the basis of admission of facts made in the pleading or otherwise without waiting for the determination of any other question arose between the parties. Since the Rule permits the passing of judgment at any stage without waiting for determination Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

KRISHNA HARE GAUR Vs. VINOD KUMAR TYAGI AND ORS

Appeal (Civil), 1755 of 2015, Judgment Date: Feb 11, 2015

-When the appointment is made de hors the rules, the same is a nullity. In such an eventuality, the statutory bar like doctrine of res judicata is not attracted. -"From the above, it is evident that even in judicial proceedings, once a fraud is proved, all advantages gained by playing fraud can be taken away. In such an eventuality the questions of non-executing of the Full Judgment