Judgments - Will
Lachhmi Narain Singh (D) Through LRs & Ors. Versus Sarjug Singh (Dead) Through LRs. & Ors.
Ranjit alias Bhaiyu Mohite Vs. Smt. Nandita Singh & Ors.
DR. RAJDEEP KAPOOR VS. MOHD. SARWAR KHAN AND ANOTHER
Law laid down - Evidence Act with strict technicalities is not applicable in mutation proceedings. Revenue Officer is only required to do enquiry to reach satisfaction in respect of evidence filed regarding acquisition of rights over land. Examination on oath and cross-examination need not be done by Tehsildar in mutation proceedings. Full Judgment
KAVITA KANWAR. Vs. MRS. PAMELA MEHTA & ORS.
SHIVAKUMAR & ORS. Versus SHARANABASAPPA & ORS.
SHYAM SAHNI VERSUS ARJUN PRAKASH AND OTHERS
GURCHARAN SINGH & ORS. VERSUS ANGREZ KAUR & ANR.
DHANPAT VERSUS SHEO RAM (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.
M.S. BHAVANI AND ANR. VERSUS M.S. RAGHU NANDAN
Pannalal Swarnkar Versus Rajkumar Soni (Rajkumar Tailors)
1. Omnibus statement of fraud on WILL, will not be sufficient in absence of specific particular as required under Order 6 Rule 4 of C.P.C. 2. Court would not return a finding of proof of WILL on assumed suspicion or supposition. Full Judgment
JIT RAM NOW DECEASED THROUGH LRS. VERSUS SATNAM SINGH
ASHA SRIVASTAVA VERSUS ARUN SRIVASTAVA & ORS
MANJU PURI VERSUS RAJIV SINGH HANSPAL & ORS.
Smt. Kanti Mishra Versus Rajendra Shankar Shukla
Clause (b) of sub-section (2) Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 would not effect a Hindu Widow's right to execute a WILL, she being an absolute owner of the property by virtue of Section 14 of the said Act. Full Judgment