Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Appeal (Civil), 4500 of 2016, Judgment Date: Apr 27, 2016

                                                                  REPORTABLE
                        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                        CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                        CIVIL APPEAL NO.4500 OF 2016
                  (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 8076 OF 2015)

BALRAM YADAV                                                      Petitioner

                                VERSUS

FULMANIYA YADAV                                                   Respondent

                               J U D G M E N T

KURIAN, J.


      Leave granted.
1.    The appellant  instituted  a  Civil  Suit  before  the  Family  Court,
Ambikapur, Sarguja, Chhattisgarh seeking a declaration to  the  effect  that
respondent is not his legally married wife. By  judgment  dated  28.12.2013,
the  Civil  Suit  was  decreed  declaring  that  the  respondent   was   not
appellant's legally married wife.
2.     The  respondent,  being  aggrieved,   moved   the   High   Court   of
Chhattisgarh. The High court, as per the impugned  order  dated  14.01.2015,
allowed the appeal holding that the  Family  Court  lacked  jurisdiction  to
deal with the matter.  According to the High Court, a  negative  declaration
was outside the jurisdiction of the Family Court.
3.    Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
4.    Section 7 of the Family Courts Act, 1984(for short  “the  Act”)  deals
with the jurisdiction of the Family Courts, which reads as follows:-
“Jurisdiction.-(1) Subject to the other provisions of  this  Act,  a  Family
Court shall-"
(a) have and exercise all  the  jurisdiction  exercisable  by  any  district
court or any subordinate civil court under any law for  the  time  being  in
force in respect of suits and proceedings of the nature referred to  in  the
explanation; and

(b) be deemed, for the purposes of exercising such jurisdiction  under  such
law, to be a district court or, as the case may be, such  subordinate  civil
court for the area to which the jurisdiction of the Family Court extends.

Explanation.-The suits and proceedings referred to in this  sub-section  are
suits and proceedings of the following nature, namely:-

(a)a suit or proceeding between the parties to a marriage for  a  decree  of
nullity of marriage (declaring the marriage to be null and void or,  as  the
case may be, annulling the marriage) or restitution of  conjugal  rights  or
judicial separation or dissolution of marriage;

(b) a suit or proceeding for a declaration as to the validity of a  marriage
or as to the matrimonial status of any person;

(c) a suit or proceeding between the parties to a marriage with  respect  to
the property of the parties or of either of them;

(d) a suit or  proceeding  for  an  order  or  injunction  in  circumstances
arising out of a marital relationship;

(e) a suit or proceeding for a declaration  as  to  the  legitimacy  of  any
person;

(f) a suit or proceeding for maintenance;

(g) a suit or proceeding in relation to the guardianship of  the  person  or
the custody of, or access to, any minor.

(2) Subject to the other provisions of this Act, a Family Court  shall  also
have and exercise-

(a) the jurisdiction exercisable by a Magistrate of the  First  Class  under
Chapter IX  (relating  to  order  for  maintenance  of  wife,  children  and
parents) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974); and
(b) such other  jurisdiction  as  may  be  conferred  on  it  by  any  other
enactment.”

5.    Section 8 of the Act deals with the exclusion of  jurisdiction,  which
reads as follows:-
“8. Exclusion of jurisdiction and pending proceedings.-Where a Family  Court
has been established  for  any  area,-  .-Where  a  Family  Court  has  been
established for any area,-"

      (a) no district court or any subordinate civil court  referred  to  in
sub-section (1) of section 7 shall,  in  relation  to  such  area,  have  or
exercise any jurisdiction in respect  of  any  suit  or  proceeding  of  the
nature referred to in the Explanation to that sub-section;

      (b) no magistrate shall, in relation to such area,  have  or  exercise
any   jurisdiction or power  under  Chapter  IX  of  the  Code  of  Criminal
Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974);

(c) every suit or proceeding of the nature referred to  in  the  Explanation
to sub-section (1) of section 7 and every proceeding under   Chapter  IX  of
the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974),-
(i) which is pending immediately before the   establishment of  such  Family
Court before any district court or subordinate court  referred  to  in  that
sub-section or, as the case may be, before any  magistrate  under  the  said
Code; and
(ii) which would have been required to be instituted or taken before  or  by
such Family Court if, before the date on which such suit or  proceeding  was
instituted or taken, this Act had come into force and such Family Court  had
been established,

shall stand transferred to such Family Court on the  date  on  which  it  is
established.”

6.    Section 20 of the Family Courts  Act,  1984  provides  for  overriding
effect of the Act on other laws or instruments having  the  effect  of  law.
The said Section reads as follows:-
“20.Act to have overriding effect- The provisions of  this  Act  shall  have
effect notwithstanding anything  inconsistent  therewith  contained  in  any
other law for the time being in force or in any instrument having effect  by
virtue of any law other than this Act.”

7.    Under Section 7(1) Explanation (b), a  Suit  or  a  proceeding  for  a
declaration as to the validity of both marriage and matrimonial status of  a
person is within the exclusive  jurisdiction  of  the  Family  Court,  since
under Section 8,  all  those  jurisdictions  covered  under  Section  7  are
excluded from the purview of the jurisdiction of the Civil Courts. In  case,
there is a dispute on the matrimonial status of any  person,  a  declaration
in that regard has to be sought only before the Family Court.  It  makes  no
difference as to whether it is an affirmative relief or a  negative  relief.
What is important is  the  declaration  regarding  the  matrimonial  status.
Section 20 also endorses the view which we  have  taken,  since  the  Family
Courts Act, 1984, has an overriding effect on other laws.
8.    In view of the above, the appeal is allowed.   The  impugned  judgment
of the High Court is set aside.  The matter is remitted to  the  High  Court
to be decided on merits.  We request the  High  Court  to  hear  the  appeal
afresh and dispose it of expeditiously, preferably within a  period  of  six
months.
      No costs.


                                                      …....................J
                                                             (KURIAN JOSEPH)

                                                      …....................J
NEW DELHI                                            (ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN)
APRIL 27, 2016

For the Latest Updates Join Now