Judgments - Complaint Case
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION VERSUS M/S. INX MEDIA PVT. LTD. & ORS
MANISH KUMAR VERSUS ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES & ORS
Smt. Samiksha Jain vs. State of M.P.
AMARSANG NATHAJI AS HIMSELF AND AS KARTA AND MANAGER Vs. HARDIK HARSHADBHAI PATEL AND ORS
The mere fact that a person has made a contradictory statement in a judicial proceeding is not by itself always sufficient to justify a prosecution under Sections 199 and 200 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) (hereinafter referred to as “the IPC”); but it must be shown that the defendant has intentionally given a false statement Full Judgment
S.R.SUKUMAR Vs. S.SUNAAD RAGHURAM
7. Upon consideration of the rival contentions and materials on record, the points falling for determination are: (i) in the facts of the case, when did the Magistrate take cognizance of the complaint for the first time i.e. on 18.05.2007 or on 21.06.2007, when the Magistrate satisfied of a prima Full Judgment
Udai Shankar Awasthi Vs State of U.P. & Anr.
CONTINUING OFFENCE: 10. Section 472 Cr.P.C. provides that in case of a continuing offence, a fresh period of limitation begins to run at every moment of the time period during which the offence continues. The expression, ‘continuing offence’ has not been defined in the Cr.P.C. because Full Judgment