Filter by Date
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

NIRMAL PREMKUMAR VERSUS STATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Appeal (Crl.), 1098 of 2024, Judgment Date: Mar 11, 2024

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Shankar Versus The State of Maharashtra

Appeal (Crl.), 954 of 2011, Judgment Date: Mar 15, 2023

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

NAND LAL AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Appeal (Crl.), 1421 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 14, 2023

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Ranvir Singh Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh

Appeal (Crl.), 1384-1385 of 2009, Judgment Date: Jan 12, 2023

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. Versus PHOOL SINGH

Appeal (Civil), 5930 of 2022, Judgment Date: Sep 02, 2022

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

State of M.P. Versus Ramji Lal Sharma & Anr.

Appeal (Crl.), 293 of 2022, Judgment Date: Mar 09, 2022

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Pappu @ Dayaram Vs. State of M.P

Criminal Appeal, 949 of 2012, Judgment Date: Jun 03, 2021

Law laid down -  Section 32 of Indian Evidence Act – Dying Declaration-The conviction can be based solely on the basis of an oral dying declaration provided such declaration is free from any doubt and its correctness and genuineness is out of question. Multiple Dying Declarations - If there are more than one dying declaration, Court needs to examine qualitative worth of each declaration and not number of declarations. The dying declaration must be examined with utmost care and caution because the maker Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. VERSUS LOVE KUSH MEENA

Appeal (Civil), 3894 of 2020, Judgment Date: Mar 24, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

HARI OM @ HERO VERSUS STATE OF U.P.

Appeal (Crl.), 1256 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jan 05, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

AMAR SINGH VERSUS THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

Appeal (Crl.), 335 of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 12, 2020

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

Balwan Singh Versus The State of Chhattisgarh and Anr

Appeal (Crl.), 727 of 2015, Judgment Date: Aug 06, 2019

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SUNITA VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA

Appeal (Crl.), 546 of 2010, Judgment Date: Jul 30, 2019

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

MAHENDRAN Versus THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU

Appeal (Crl.), 1266 of 2010, Judgment Date: Feb 21, 2019

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

KRISHNEGOWDA & ORS. Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ARKALGUD POLICE

Appeal (Crl.), 635 of 2006, Judgment Date: Mar 28, 2017

It is settled law that mere latches on the part of Investigating Officer itself cannot be a ground for acquitting the accused. If that is the basis, then every criminal case will depend upon the will and design of the Investigating Officer. The Courts have to independently deal with the case and should arrive at a just conclusion beyond reasonable doubt basing on the evidence on record.   Once there is Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

H.D. SIKAND (D) TH:LRS. Vs. C.B.I.& ANR.

Appeal (Crl.), 729 of 2011, Judgment Date: Dec 15, 2016

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

BAIJNATH AND ORS Vs. STATE OF M P

Appeal (Crl.), 1097 of 2016, Judgment Date: Nov 18, 2016

(38) A cumulative consideration of the overall evidence on the facet of dowry, leaves us unconvinced about the truthfulness of the charge qua the accused persons. The prosecution in our estimate, has failed to prove this indispensable component of the two offences beyond reasonable doubt. The factum of unnatural death in the matrimonial home and that too within seven years of marriage therefore is thus ipso facto not sufficient to Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

MANOJ V/s UOI & ORS.

W.P.(C), 11979 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 15, 2016

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

BIJENDRA BHAGAT Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Appeal (Crl.), 2202 of 2011, Judgment Date: May 29, 2015

According to the witnesses these two accused were also armed with country made pistols. The injuries suffered by the deceased are incised wounds and one fire arm injury. However, none of the injuries on the person of the deceased could be attributed to the lathi which was supposedly in the hands of the appellant. Undoubtedly, three injuries on the person Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

MANOHARLAL Vs. STATE OF M.P

Appeal (Crl.), 1407 of 2013, Judgment Date: Nov 21, 2014

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

ANANDA POOJARY Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Appeal (Crl.), 2202 of 2014, Judgment Date: Oct 14, 2014

Full Judgment