Judgments - Reasonable Classification
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
SAYUNKTA SANGARSH SAMITI Versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Afjal Ansari versus State of UP
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Deepika Singh Versus Central Administrative Tribunal and Others
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
Smt. Urmila Singh Versus Saudan Singh
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
AMAR VIVEK AGGARWAL & ORS. VERSUS HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA & ORS.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Rushikesh Bharat Garud Versus The State of Maharashtra and others
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Estate Officer Versus Colonel H.V. Mankotia (Retired)
Patna High Court (Single Judge)
Awadh Kishor Roy Vs. The State of Bihar
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
STATE OF ORISSA Versus DASARATHI MEHER
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Vs. DILEEP KUMAR SINGH
These appeals raise an interesting question as to the interpretation of a proviso contained in Section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 (in short the "1995 Act"). It is well settled that the provisions of a statute must be read harmoniously together. However, if this is not possible then it is settled law that where there is a conflict between two Sections, and you cannot reconcile the two, you have to determine which is the leading provision Full Judgment