Filter by Date
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Md. Jabbar Ali & Ors. Vs. The State of Assam

Appeal (Crl.), 1105 of 2010, Judgment Date: Oct 17, 2022

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Ravi Sharma Versus State (Government of NCT of Delhi) and Anr.

Appeal (Crl.), 410-411 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 11, 2022

Full Judgment

Tags Evidence
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Nanda Dulal Pradhan & Anr. Versus Dibakar Pradhan & Anr.

Appeal (Civil), 4151 of 2022, Judgment Date: Jul 11, 2022

Full Judgment

Tags Evidence
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Chandresh Marskole Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh

Criminal Appeal, 1580 of 2009, Judgment Date: May 04, 2022

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Shiv Kumar Singh and another Vs. State of M.P.

MCRC, 52754 of 2021, Judgment Date: Dec 16, 2021

Law laid down - For the purpose of invoking the provisions of Section 65 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the conditions of Section 63 has to be satisfied first then only secondary evidence can be allowed. Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Anil Kumar Kanojia Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Criminal Appeal, 2085 of 1997, Judgment Date: Dec 09, 2021

Law laid down -  1.Evidence of a witness examined in other trial can be relied and used only when exigencies provided under Section 299 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 are fulfilled i.e. if it is proved that witness had absconded or died or there is no immediate prospect of arresting him, without an amount of delay, expense or inconvenience which, under the circumstances of the case, would be unreasonable. 2.If the eventualities mentioned in Section 299(1) of the Code of Criminal Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

PARVEEN @ SONU vs. The State of Haryana

Appeal (Crl.), 1571 of 2021, Judgment Date: Dec 07, 2021

Full Judgment

Tags Evidence
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Union of India and Ors. Versus Mudrika Singh

Appeal (Civil), 6859 of 2021, Judgment Date: Dec 03, 2021

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

NAVEEN CHANDER KAPUR VERSUS STATE & ORS

TEST.CAS., 3 of 2021, Judgment Date: Oct 22, 2021

Full Judgment

Tags Evidence
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

SUSHIL ANSAL VERSUS STATE OF NCT DELHI

CRL.M.C., 2107 of 2021, Judgment Date: Sep 15, 2021

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Devkaran Vs. State of M.P.

Criminal Appeal, 333 of 2008, Judgment Date: Aug 18, 2021

Law laid down - (A) Conviction only on the basis of dying declaration recorded under Section 32 of Evidence Act – Before convicting only on the basis of dying declaration, the Court must act with prudence and due caution and care and in case doubt arises, then it is an obligation to closely scrutinise all the relevant attendant circumstances. Judgments relied upon :– (1) Khushal Rao Vs. State of Bombay [AIR 1958 SC 22]. (2) Panchdeo Singh Vs. State of Bihar [AIR 2002 Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Naresh vs. State of MP

Criminal Appeal, 215 of 2010, Judgment Date: Aug 12, 2021

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Munnalal and Jagdish Vs. State of M.P.

Criminal Appeal, 32, 119 of 2011, Judgment Date: Aug 04, 2021

Law laid down - (1) Prosecutrix in a rape case – conviction can be based only on the basis of solitary evidence of prosecutrix but such witness should be of “sterling quality”. Citation relied upon - Krishna Kumar Malik Vs. State of Haryana [(2011) 7 SCC 130] & Rai Sandeep @ Deepu Vs. State (NCT of Delhi) reported in (2012) 8 SCC 21]. (2) While deciding rape case, the Court must also evaluate the impact of such insinuation on a person Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Radheshyam vs. Kamla Devi & Others

MP, 630 of 2020, Judgment Date: Jul 31, 2021

Law laid down - (1) Under Section 112 of Indian Evidence Act birth during marriage, is conclusive proof of legitimacy, therefore bars DNA testing but when blood relation of siblings is being challenged, there shall be no bar under Section 112 of Indian Evidence Act. Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

ATLANTA INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. VERSUS DELTA MARINE COMPANY & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 2876 of 2021, Judgment Date: Jul 19, 2021

Full Judgment

Tags Evidence
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

R.K. Akhande vs. Special Police Establishment, Lokayukt, Bhopal and another

MISC. CRL, 45036 of 2020, Judgment Date: Jun 30, 2021

Law laid down - 1. Direction by the Magistrate to give voice sample during investigation does not violate Article 20(3) of the Constitution of India. 2. Article 20 of the Constitution of India extends certain protection to a person in respect of the conviction for offence and sub-clause (3) thereof provides that no person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself. The protection extended by Article 20(3) is only to the extent of being written against Full Judgment

Tags Evidence
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Pappu @ Dayaram Vs. State of M.P

Criminal Appeal, 949 of 2012, Judgment Date: Jun 03, 2021

Law laid down -  Section 32 of Indian Evidence Act – Dying Declaration-The conviction can be based solely on the basis of an oral dying declaration provided such declaration is free from any doubt and its correctness and genuineness is out of question. Multiple Dying Declarations - If there are more than one dying declaration, Court needs to examine qualitative worth of each declaration and not number of declarations. The dying declaration must be examined with utmost care and caution because the maker Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Kuldeep Choudhary @ Kuldeep Yadav & another Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Criminal Appeal, 585 of 2014, Judgment Date: Feb 26, 2021

Law laid down - Section 32(1) of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - If nature of injuries found on the person of deceased were not grievous in nature and were not sufficient to cause death, oral dying declaration/statement given by him does not fall within the ambit and scope of “dying declaration” envisaged in Section 32(1) of the Act. The Court needs to examine carefully whether injuries on the person are sufficient to cause death and this depends on the factual matrix Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

DR. RAJDEEP KAPOOR VS. MOHD. SARWAR KHAN AND ANOTHER

Misc. Appeal, 6597 of 2019, Judgment Date: Jan 08, 2021

Law laid down - Evidence Act with strict technicalities is not applicable in mutation proceedings. Revenue Officer is only required to do enquiry to reach satisfaction in respect of evidence filed regarding acquisition of rights over land. Examination on oath and cross-examination need not be done by Tehsildar in mutation proceedings. Full Judgment

Tags Evidence Will
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

JAGMAIL SINGH & ANR. VERSUS KARAMJIT SINGH & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 1889 of 2020, Judgment Date: May 13, 2020

Full Judgment

Tags Evidence