Judgments - Benefit of doubt
RAJENDRA SINGH VERSUS STATE OF UTTARANCHAL
NAZIM VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Shyam Kali Dubey Versus State of Madhya Pradesh
SUREPALLY SRINIVAS VERSUS THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (NOW STATE OF TELANGANA)
RAMA DEVI VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR
NIRMAL PREMKUMAR VERSUS STATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Shankar Versus The State of Maharashtra
NAND LAL AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Ranvir Singh Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. Versus PHOOL SINGH
State of M.P. Versus Ramji Lal Sharma & Anr.
Pappu @ Dayaram Vs. State of M.P
Law laid down - Section 32 of Indian Evidence Act – Dying Declaration-The conviction can be based solely on the basis of an oral dying declaration provided such declaration is free from any doubt and its correctness and genuineness is out of question. Multiple Dying Declarations - If there are more than one dying declaration, Court needs to examine qualitative worth of each declaration and not number of declarations. The dying declaration must be examined with utmost care and caution because the maker Full Judgment
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. VERSUS LOVE KUSH MEENA
HARI OM @ HERO VERSUS STATE OF U.P.
AMAR SINGH VERSUS THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
Balwan Singh Versus The State of Chhattisgarh and Anr
SUNITA VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA
MAHENDRAN Versus THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU
KRISHNEGOWDA & ORS. Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ARKALGUD POLICE
It is settled law that mere latches on the part of Investigating Officer itself cannot be a ground for acquitting the accused. If that is the basis, then every criminal case will depend upon the will and design of the Investigating Officer. The Courts have to independently deal with the case and should arrive at a just conclusion beyond reasonable doubt basing on the evidence on record. Once there is Full Judgment
