Judgments - Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)
LAKHBIR SINGH Vs ARUN KHANNA
Rahul And 2 Others Vs State Of U.P. Thru S.S.P. And 2 Others
KIRPAL KAUR Vs. JITENDER PAL SINGH & ORS.
VIJAY MALLYA Vs. ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE,MIN.OF FINANCE.
INDIAN PERFORMING RIGHTS SOCIETY LTD. Vs. SANJAY DALIA & ANR
QUANTUM SECURITIES PVT LTD AND ORS Vs. NEW DELHI TELEVISION LTD
A.P. STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD. Vs. MATETI S.V.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
M/S GMG ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES & ORS. Vs. M/S ISAA GREEN POWER SOLUTION & ORS.
Smt. Premwati Devi Vs. State Of U.P. & Another
Having considered the aforesaid submissions, this court finds that the application to withdraw the suit in appeal has been filed under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC, which was rightly held to be not maintainable as there was no compromise between the parties. Even otherwise, the suit has been dismissed on merits and also applications for amendment have been rejected. Full Judgment
JAGDISH CHAND SHARMA Vs. NARAIN SINGH SAINI (DEAD) THR. LRS. & ORS
14. As would be evident from the contents of Section 63 of the Act that to execute the Will as contemplated therein, the testator would have to sign or affix his mark to it or the same has to be signed by some other person in his presence and on his direction. Further the signature or mark of the testator or the signature of the person signing for him has to be so Full Judgment
FORESHORE CO-OP.HNG.SOCIETY LTD. Vs. PRAVEEN D DESAI (D) THR.LRS. & ORS.
P.R.YELUMALAI Vs. N.M.RAVI
However, we find that after the execution Court had dismissed the execution proceeding on the ground of delay in depositing the amount, the same question was dealt with by the original side of the Trial Court as well in the application for extension of time. Since both the Courts have given concurrent findings that the case for extension of time was not made out, we Full Judgment