Judgments - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860
AJAY SINGH AND ANR AND ETC. Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND ANR
Performance of judicial duty in the manner prescribed by law is fundamental to the concept of rule of law in a democratic State. It has been quite often said and, rightly so, that the judiciary is the protector and preserver of rule of law. Effective functioning of the said sacrosanct duty has been entrusted to the judiciary and that entrustment expects the courts to conduct Full Judgment
Uttam Chand Verma & Anr. v. State of M.P. & Ano.
Upendra Tripathi & another Vs. State of M.P. & another
VIJENDRA SINGH Vs. STATE OF U.P.
KISHORE BHADKE Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
JAIRAM S/O NATHU SALUNKE Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.
Vinod Kumar Sen Vs.Smt Shanti Devi and others
Ram Adhin @ Ramdin @ Charaka Versus State Of Chhattisgarh
RAM CHANDER & ORS. Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
JITENDER @ KALLA Vs STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH Vs. SANJAY KUMAR ALIAS SUNNY
H.D. SIKAND (D) TH:LRS. Vs. C.B.I.& ANR.
SHARAT BABU DIGUMARTI Vs. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
MUTHURAMALINGAM & ORS. Vs. STATE REP.BY INSP.OF POLICE
GURCHARAN SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
There is thus neither any proximate nor remote acts of omission or commission on the part of the appellant and his family members that can be irrefutably construed to be a direct or indirect cause or factor compelling Surjit and her daughters to take the extreme step of self-elimination. It is thus manifest that the offence punishable is one of abetment of the commission of suicide by any person, predicating existence of a Full Judgment
