Judgments - Mines and Minerals Development and Regulations Act, 1957
M/s Trinity Infrastructure Vs. The State of M.P. and others
Law laid down - Question No.(I) : The stone for making Gitti by mechanical crushing (i.e. use of crusher) specified at Serial No.6 of Schedule-I of the M.P. Minor Mineral Rules, 1996, is governed by Rule 6 under Chapter III and supported by Rules 9, 17, 18, 21, 22, 26, 29 and 30 of the 1996 Rules in respect of its grant and renewal. It does not show that the quarry lease in respect of Mineral at Serial No.6 of Schedule-I Full Judgment
Ramkumar Sahu Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & others
ACC Limited Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & others
Federation of Indian Mineral Industries & ors. Versus Union of India & Anr
M/s Pankaj Kumar Rai Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Others
Law Laid down - In the light of series of decisions of the Supreme Court, it is well settled that the provisos of the Statutes have to be read as a whole by giving harmonious construction to all the provisions of the law so that none of the provision is rendered redundant. Keeping in view the principle of harmonious construction, the third proviso to Rule 68(1) of M.P. Minor Mineral Rules, 1996 is additional relaxation to Rule 4 and 68(1) of the Full Judgment
SAMAJ PARIVARTANA SAMUDAYA & ORS. Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.
BHUSHAN POWER AND STEEL LTD. Vs. S. L. SEAL & ORS.
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. Vs. NIRMALABEN S. MEHTA & ANR. ETC.
STATE OF KERALA & ORS. Vs. M/S KERALA RARE EARTH & MINERALS LIMITED & ORS
COMMON CAUSE Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Based on the interpretation placed by us on Section 4A(4) of the MMDR Act, and Rule 28 of the Mineral Concession Rules, we can draw the following conclusions. Firstly, unless an order is passed by the State Government declaring, that a mining lease has lapsed, the mining lease would be deemed to be subsisting, up to the date of expiry of the Full Judgment