Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 8249
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 09, 2015
mere passing of an order of dismissal or termination would not be
effective unless it is published and communicated to the officer concerned.
If the appointing authority passes an order of dismissal, but does not
communicate it to the officer concerned, theoretically it is possible that
unlike in the case on a judicial order pronounced in Court, the authority
may change its mind and decide to modify its order. The order Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 1978
of 2007, Judgment Date: Oct 09, 2015
the basic question of law which arises
for consideration is as to whether or not the manufacturer/exporter is
entitled to rebate of the excise duty paid both on the inputs and on the
manufactured product, when excise duty is paid on a manufactured product
and also on the inputs which have gone into manufacturing the product and
such manufactured product is exported?
The aforesaid discussion Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 8390-8391
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 08, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 8397
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 08, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 2967
of 2012, Judgment Date: Oct 08, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 8399
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 08, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 3594
of 2011, Judgment Date: Oct 08, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India
Appeal (Civil), 8441
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 08, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 4747-4749
of 2009, Judgment Date: Oct 07, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 8314
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 07, 2015
Further, the High Court has failed to consider another important fact that
the Government being guardian of public finance it has right to refuse the
lowest or any other tender bid or bids submitted by the bidders to it
provided its decision is neither arbitrary nor unreasonable as it amounts
to violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The appellant-
Corporation’s decision in cancelling Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India
Appeal (Civil), 2733
of 2007, Judgment Date: Oct 07, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 6088
of 2013, Judgment Date: Oct 07, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 637
of 2007, Judgment Date: Oct 07, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 8378
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 07, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 7147
of 2008, Judgment Date: Oct 07, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India
Appeal (Civil), 8427
of 2014, Judgment Date: Oct 06, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 6975
of 2009, Judgment Date: Oct 06, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 1018
of 2006, Judgment Date: Oct 06, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 8275
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 06, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 6930-6931
of 2005, Judgment Date: Oct 06, 2015
Full Judgment
