Judgments - APPLICATION U/s 378 DEFECTIVE
SANDEEP KHANUJA Vs. ATUL DANDE & ANR.
P. SIVANANDI Vs. RAJEEV KUMAR & ORS.
These appeals raise a narrow question for consideration, namely, whether the Annual Confidential Report (ACR) of an officer forms a part of his ‘service record’ and whether it could be ignored for the purposes of his promotion merely on the ground that it was written after some delay. In our opinion, the ACR of an officer forms a part of his service record and he cannot be Full Judgment
BITHIKA MAZUMDAR AND ANR. Vs. SAGAR PAL AND ORS.
STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. Vs. RAMESH PRASAD VERMA (DEAD)THR. LRS.
MRS IVY C.DA. CONCEICAO Vs. STATE OF GOA & ORS.
MRS IVY C.DA. CONCEICAO Vs. STATE OF GOA & ORS.
STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. ETC. Vs. MOHINDER SINGH & ORS. ETC.
HARYANA URBAN DEV. AUTHORITY & ORS. Vs. ORCHID INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPERS P.LTD.
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, KIADB, MYSORE & ANR. Vs. ANASUYA BAI (D) BY LRS. & ORS.
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Vs. M. SELVAKUMAR & ANR.
When the attempts of Physically Handicapped candidates of OBC Category and Physically Handicapped candidates of General Category, who appeared in the Civil Services Examination are made equal, and a Physically Handicapped candidate belonging to OBC Category, in addition to 10 years relaxation in age also enjoys 3 years more age relaxation for appearing in the examination, we cannot agree with Full Judgment
KULDEEP SINGH PATHANIA Vs. BIKRAM SINGH JARYAL
ASHA BHIKANRAO SONEWANE Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
S.SREEDHAR REDDY & ORS. Vs. GOVT.OF A.P. & ORS.
D.M.,ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. SWAPNA NAYAK & ORS
AGYAPAUL SINGH Vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA (SAMB)
STATE OF TRIPURA & ORS. Vs. NIKHIL RANJAN CHAKRABORTY & ORS.
The law is thus clear that a candidate has the right to be considered in the light of the existing rules, namely, “rules in force on the date” the consideration takes place and that there is no rule of absolute application that vacancies must invariably be filled by the law existing on the date when they arose. As against the case of total exclusion and Full Judgment