Judgments - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION DEFECTIVE U/S 372 CR.P.C (LEAVE TO APPEAL)
MOHAMMAD SADIQUE Vs. DARBARA SINGH GURU
VLS FINACNE LTD. & ANR. Vs. COMMISSIONER F INCOME TAX & ANR.
ASHOK KUMAR GIRI Vs. GOVT. OF INDIA AND ORS
BALRAM YADAV Vs. FULMANIYA YADAV
ITC LIMITED GURGAON Vs. COMMR.OF I.T(TDS) DELHI
M.K.INDRAJEET SINHJI COTTON P.LTD. Vs. NARMADA COTTO COOP.SPG.MILLS LD.& ORS.
ORISSA STATE HOUSING BOARD Vs. INDIRA ENGLISH MEDIUM SCHOOL & ORS
VISVESVARAYA TECH.UNIVERSITY Vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
M/S SHINHAN APEX CORPORATION Vs. M/S EURO APEX B.V
AXIS BANK Vs. SBS ORGANICS PVT. LTD & ANR.
MESSER HOLDINGS LTD. Vs. SHYAM MADANMOHAN RUIA & ORS
RAJESH VERMA Vs. ASHWANI KUMAR KHANNA
M/S SHILPA SHARES AND SECURITIES & ORS Vs. THE NATIONAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD & ORS
RAMO BAI & ORS. Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA Vs. V.N. PUBLIC HEALTH AND EDUCATIONAL TRUST & ORS
The application for grant of approval was filed with the Essentiality Certificate which was a conditional one and, therefore, a defective one. It was not an Essentiality Certificate in law. In such a situation, the High Court could not have directed for consideration of the application for the purpose of the inspection. Such a direction, we are disposed to think, runs counter to the law Full Judgment
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Vs. M/S JSC CENTRODOSTROY
It has consistently been laid down by this Court that construction of the terms of a Contract is primarily for an Arbitrator or Arbitral Tribunal to decide and unless the Arbitrator or Arbitral Tribunal construes the contract in such a way that no fair minded or reasonable person could do, no interference by Court is called for. Viewed Full Judgment