Judgments - PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL)
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
MADHURI GHOSH & ANR Vs. DEBOBROTO DUTTA & ANR
Tags Civil Procedure
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER & ORS. Vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA & ANR.
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
M/S WELSPUN PROJECTS LTD. Vs. DIRECTOR, STATE TRANSPORT PUNJAB AND ANR
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
STATE BANK OF PATIALA Vs. MUKESH JAIN & ANR.
Tags Debt
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
OASIS DEALCOM PVT. LTD. Vs. KHAZANA DEALCOMM PVT.LTD. & ORS.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. Vs. JAI KISHAN GOEL & ORS
Tags Land Acquisition
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. RAMESH SINGH AND ORS.
Tags Land Acquisition
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
PRATAP SINGH YADAV Vs. HUDA & ANR
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
SRI MAIREMBAM PRITHVIRAJ @ PRITHIBIRAJ SINGH Vs. SHRI PUKHREM SHARATCHANDRA SINGH
Tags Election
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
COMMR.COMMERCIAL TAX U.P. Vs. M/S OSWAL GREENTECH LIMITED
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
COMMR.OF COMMERCIAL TAX & ORS. Vs. M/S BAJAJ AUTO LTD.& ANR
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. NAFE SINGH AND ORS
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. AMAN AND ORS
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
T.S.DAS & ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
NAVJOT SINGH SIDHU Vs. OM PRAKASH SONI & ORS
Tags Election
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
KAIL LTD. FORMERLY KITCHEN APPL.(I) LD. Vs. STATE OF KERALA TR.JT.COMMR.(LAW)
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS Vs. JAGJIT SINGH AND ORS
Having traversed the legal parameters with reference to the application of the principle of ‘equal pay for equal work’, in relation to temporary employees (daily-wage employees, ad-hoc appointees, employees appointed on casual basis, contractual employees and the like), the sole factor that requires our determination is, whether the concerned employees (before this Court), were rendering similar duties and responsibilities, as were Full Judgment