Judgments - REFERRED CASE(CAPITAL CASE)
ASHA VERMAN & ORS. Vs. MAHARAJ SINGH & ORS.
On applying the principles as laid down in the case of Sarla Verma (supra), 50% of the salary must be added to the income of the deceased towards future prospects of income, which comes to Rs.6,900/- per month, i.e. Rs.82,800/- per annum. Deducting 1/4th for personal expenses and applying the appropriate multiplier taking into consideration the age of Full Judgment
DHOLE GOVIND SAHEBRAO & ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
VED MITTER GILL Vs. U.T. ADMINISTRATION, CHANDIGARH & ORS
A. RAGHU, SON OF RAJAIAH Vs. GOVT. OF A.P. & ORS.
The judgments cited pertain to the particular rule of seniority, which was subject matter of consideration. None of the seniority rules which were taken into consideration is akin to rule 15 which is to be applied for determining the inter se seniority of Sub- Inspectors of Police, in the present case. Full Judgment
DASHMESH EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY Vs. PUNJAB URBAN DEVE.AUTHORITY & ORS.
MOHAN SINGH GILL & ORS. ETC. ETC. Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. ETC. ETC.
AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX OFFICER & ANR. Vs. GOODRICKE GROUP LTD. & ANR.
COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, GAUHATI & ORS. Vs. M/S. SATI OIL UDYOG LTD. & ANR.
M/S MILLENNIUM WIRES P LTD Vs. STATE TRADING CORP. OF INDIA LTD & ORS
It would suffice to say here that injunctions against the negotiating banks for making payments to the beneficiary must be given cautiously as constant judicial interference in the normal practices of market can have disastrous consequences as it affects the trustworthiness of the Indian banks and markets. In the circumstances as narrated above and in light of the settled law on the point of injunction against the banks to honour their Full Judgment
ANIRUDH KUMAR Vs. MUNICIPAL CORP. OF DELHI & ORS.
Be as that may, this nature of ligation cannot be allowed to be settled between the parties as it involves public interest and violation of rule of law. The running of the Pathological Lab in the building by the respondent-owners amount to violation of the rule of law and affects the public interest, therefore, it is public interest litigation even though the appellant herein Full Judgment
AVAS AYUKT,U.P.AVAS EVAM VIKAS PAR.& ORS Vs. BHAGWAN TIWARI & ANR.
VIPULBHAI M. CHAUDHARY Vs. GUJARAT COOP. MILK MARKT. FED. LTD & ORS
DHROPADABAI & ORS. Vs. M/S. TECHNOCRAFT TOOLINGS
T.NADU TERMD.FULL TIME TEM.LIC EMP.ASSN. Vs. LIFE INSURANCE CORP.OF INDIA & ORS.
The concerned workmen are the members of the appellant-Associations, Federation of Employees Association, Workers Association and other concerned individual workmen who were working in the branches of the Corporation at various places in the country have raised the existing industrial dispute between the concerned workmen and the management of Full Judgment