Judgments - Chhatisgarh High Court
Dr. Apurva Ghiya Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Ors
No first information report under Section 154 of the CrPC can be registered for offence under Section 188 of the IPC. Full Judgment
Miss Sajida Khan Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Anr
Anil Kumar Gupta & Anr Versus Kamal Prasad & Anr
Smt. Kishori Pathak & Ors Versus Ludaru Ram Mourya & Ors
M/s Ashok Kumar Mittal Versus State Of Chhattisgarh & Anr
Chief Executive Officer Naya Raipur Development Authority Versus M/s Jitf Water Infrastructure Ltd.
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Versus Vivek Gir and Anr
Smt. Geeta Yadav and Ors Versus Dhannulal Yadav and Ors
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Versus Nitaichandra Saha and Ors
M/s I Square Infrastructure And Developers and Ors Versus State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors
Naresh Chandra Gupta Versus State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors
Krishna Kumar Chandrakar and Ors Versus Bhim Prasad (deceased) Thr LRS
Steel Authority of India Versus Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and Ors
Union of India and Ors Versus Himanshu Verma and Ors
Hiran Deo Prasad Versus State of Chhattisgarh and Ors
National Insurance Company Limited Versus Khorin Bai Sori and Ors
Ajay Kashyap Versus Smt. Shashi Prabha Kashyap
Chhattisgarh Rajya Gramin Bank Versus Meghraj Pathak and Ors
Regulation 2013 does not exclude Dearness Allowance from the term Pay for the purpose of calculating gratuity. For the officers retiring from the C.G. Rajya Gramin Bank gratuity amount payable shall be Basic Pay and Dearness Allowance. Full Judgment
Akash Sen Versus State of Chhattisgarh and Ors
The proceedings under Section 40(1) of the Adhiniyam cannot be left unattended without consequential order if the office bearer against whom the proceedings has been drawn is found guilty of the charges levelled against him. It is incumbent upon the Sub Divisional Officer in the course of deciding a matter regarding removal of office bearers of the panchayat under Section 40 of the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam to also prescribe the consequence of the order, as is required in the later Full Judgment
Suresh Chandra Khandelwal Versus State of Chhattisgarh
Procedure prescribed u/S 82 CrPC not followed before declaring an accused absconder. Such accused is not disentitled for availing benefit of anticipatory bail u/S 438 CrPC. Full Judgment