Judgments - Madhya Pradesh High Court
Mahesh Prasad Dixit vs. State of MP
Mr. Akshay N. Patel Versus Reserve Bank of India and Another
Ban of export in respect of KN95 Masks, Personal Protective Equipment Kits and other products does not amount to violation of fundamental right guaranteed under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India. Its a purely policy matter and the Government of India does have the power to frame Trade Policy in exercise of powers conferred under the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992. The Circular issued by Reserve Bank of India dated 23/01/2020 in respect of Merchanting Trade Transactions is Full Judgment
Smt. Sunita Gandharva Versus State of M.P. & Anr.
Surendra Kumar Jain vs. State of M.P. & Ors.
RAM AVATAR GAUR AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS
Vipin Dhanaitkar Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & Others
Law laid down - 1. The dispute, as to whether a particular property was or was not recognized as private property of the Ruler, is itself a dispute arising out of the terms of the Covenant, and therefore, not adjudicable in light of Article 363 of the Constitution of India. 2. The Khasgi (Devi Ahilya Bai Holkar Charities) Trust, Indore does not have title of the Trust properties, as keeping in view the covenant signed by the erstwhile Ruler of Holkar State Full Judgment
State of Madhya Pradesh & Others Versus Khasgi (Devi Ahilya Bai Holkar Charities) Trust, Indore & Others
Law laid down – 1. The dispute, as to whether a particular property was or was not recognized as private property of the Ruler, is itself a dispute arising out of the terms of the Covenant, and therefore, not adjudicable in light of Article 363 of the Constitution of India. 2. The Khasgi (Devi Ahilya Bai Holkar Charities) Trust, Indore does not have title of the Trust properties, as keeping in view the covenant signed by the erstwhile Ruler of Holkar State Full Judgment
Kasturi Devi and others Vs. State of MP and another
Smt. Premlata Raikwar Vs. The State of M.P. & others
Deendayal Prathmik Shahkari Upbhokta Bhandar, Hata Versus State of M.P. and others
Shakuntala Khatik Vs. State of M.P.
Kavindra Kiyawat Vs. State of M.P. through Special Police Department and Ors
State of M.P & Ors. Vs. Ramesh Gir
Law laid down - 1. When the Rules are silent about power of suspension, then the general principle of suspension will apply. The general principle is that under the ordinary law of master and servant the authority which has power to appoint an employee has the implicit power to place him under interim suspension. Such interim suspension can be on account of contemplated or pending departmental enquiry or due to registration of the criminal case or for any other justifiable reason. Full Judgment
M/s Trinity Infrastructure Vs. The State of M.P. and others
Law laid down - Question No.(I) : The stone for making Gitti by mechanical crushing (i.e. use of crusher) specified at Serial No.6 of Schedule-I of the M.P. Minor Mineral Rules, 1996, is governed by Rule 6 under Chapter III and supported by Rules 9, 17, 18, 21, 22, 26, 29 and 30 of the 1996 Rules in respect of its grant and renewal. It does not show that the quarry lease in respect of Mineral at Serial No.6 of Schedule-I Full Judgment