Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 000488-000488
of 1999, Judgment Date: May 03, 1999
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 004576-004576
of 1997, Judgment Date: Feb 18, 1999
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 005517-005518
of 1997, Judgment Date: Nov 04, 1997
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India
SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE, ....
Judgment Date: Sep 03, 1997
From a perusal of Section 6, it would appear that the Central or the State Government or any other authority (depending upon the category of the public servant) has the right to consider the facts of each case and to decide whether that "public servant" is to be prosecuted or not. Since the Section clearly prohibits the Courts from taking cognizance of the offences specified therein, it envisages that Central or the State Government or the "other authority" has not Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Writ Petition (Crl.), 000666-000670
of 1992, Judgment Date: Aug 13, 1997
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 2106-2109
of 1995, Judgment Date: Mar 20, 1997
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 645
of 1993, Judgment Date: Dec 18, 1996
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 42
of 1990, Judgment Date: Oct 08, 1996
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 311-12
of 1995, Judgment Date: Feb 24, 1995
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 648
of 1990, Judgment Date: Aug 12, 1994
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 424
of 1987, Judgment Date: Nov 19, 1993
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 400
of 1993, Judgment Date: May 05, 1993
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India
SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE, ...
Judgment Date: Nov 24, 1992
there was no motive for demanding and accepting the bribe because no bill was pending before him for pre-audit. Secondly, there was no independent witness examined although it was possible for the prosecution to secure one to witness the actual transaction. The only witness who could be said to be independent was the Executive Magistrate who was asked by the District Magistrate to accompany the raiding party for laying the trap. Even this witness, in his deposition, has failed to support Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Criminal Rev. Pet., 1079
of 1992, Judgment Date: May 06, 1992
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), ----
Judgment Date: Jan 17, 1992
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India
SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE, Criminal Appeal No. 400 of 1979
Judgment Date: Jul 25, 1991
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 633
of 1991, Judgment Date: Feb 07, 1991
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 526
of 1980, Judgment Date: Oct 09, 1990
Full Judgment
Patna High Court
----
Judgment Date: Mar 28, 1989
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 2377
of 1987, Judgment Date: Sep 12, 1988
Full Judgment
