Allahabad High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
WRIT - A, 36228
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 06, 2015
Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
CR->CIVIL REVISION, 569
of 2004, Judgment Date: Jul 06, 2015
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
CRIMINAL APPEAL, 2591
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 06, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Single Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 860
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 06, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 10560
of 2013, Judgment Date: Jul 06, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 3385
of 2012, Judgment Date: Jul 03, 2015
The legal nodus that we are called upon to unravel in this Appeal is
whether the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (L.A. Act for brevity) as amended
from time to time, requires an Award to be passed even in respect of lands
expropriated by the State pursuant to the exercise of special powers in
cases of urgency contained in Section 17 thereof. It is indeed ironical
that what Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 67-70
of 2009, Judgment Date: Jul 03, 2015
We find that although
the case of the prosecution suffers from many infirmities and there has
been unexplained reluctance in bringing the relevant witnesses on record,
apart from parents of the deceased, the doctor and the Investigating
Officer, even Triloki Sharma and the Chowkidar who saw the accused persons
disposing of the body of the deceased, have also not been examined. Yet we
may not Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 2244
of 2009, Judgment Date: Jul 03, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 442
of 2010, Judgment Date: Jul 03, 2015
With respect to this finding of the High Court, we are of the opinion that
the High Court should have relied firstly on the documents as stipulated
under Rule 12(3)(b) and only in the absence, the medical opinion should
have been sought. We find that the Trial Court has also dealt with this
aspect of the ossification test. The Trial Court noted that the respondent
had cited Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227, 2814
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 03, 2015
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
APPLICATION U/s 482, 17349
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 03, 2015
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
SPECIAL APPEAL, 434
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 03, 2015
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
ARB.A., 8,3496,79
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 03, 2015
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
LPA, 1317
of 2007, Judgment Date: Jul 03, 2015
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
W.P.(C), 3625
of 2013, Judgment Date: Jul 03, 2015
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
RSA, 178
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 03, 2015
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
MAC.APP., 146,459
of 2013, Judgment Date: Jul 03, 2015
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
MAC.APP., 191
of 2014, Judgment Date: Jul 03, 2015
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CRL.A., 786
of 2012, Judgment Date: Jul 03, 2015
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CRL.M.C., 2592
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 03, 2015
Full Judgment
