Judgments
Ugrasen Vs. The Union of India
Dilip Kumar Choudhary Vs. The State of Bihar
M.L. Mittal Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & another
Law laid down - Mere pendency of an appeal against the acquittal order of an employee does not confer any right upon the respondent/employer to withhold the retiral dues of the employee. Full Judgment
ASHIM @ ASIM KUMAR HARANATH BHATTACHARYA VERSUS NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY
TAIJUDDIN Versus STATE OF ASSAM & ORS.
Committee of Creditors of Amtek Auto Limited through Corporation Bank Versus Dinkar T. Venkatsubramanian and others
Neha Tyagi Versus Lieutenant Colonel Deepak Tyagi
DR. G. SADASIVAN NAIR VERSUS COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Phool Singh Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh
Balaji Chemist Vs. Indian Red Cross Society & The General Secretary
Smt. Nirmala Devi vs. Anil Kumar Tiwari
Law laid down - Held: Section 5 (i) and Section 11 of the Act of 1955, makes it clear that if either party has a spouse living at the time of the marriage and if such marriage is solemnized after commencement of the Act of 1955, the same is void ipso-jure. The fact that whether the other party had the knowledge of existing spouse living at the time of marriage is immaterial Section 11 of the Act of 1955 only prescribes marriages Full Judgment
BOMBAY HOSPITAL & MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTRE VERSUS ASHA JAISWAL & ORS.
VINOD KUMAR v. AMRITPAL @ CHHOTU & ORS.
Laxmikant Sharma and Ors Vs. The State Of Bihar and Ors
Akram S/o Amanat Khan & Fazal S/o Taki Khan Vs. State of M.P.
Law Laid Down - Chance Witness- Interested witnessEvidentiary value - (i) If presence of witness is satisfactorily established, his statement cannot be discarded by treating him as mere “chance witness”. The expression ‘chance witnesses’ is borrowed from countries where every man’s home is considered his castle and every one must have an explanation for his presence elsewhere or in another man’s castle. It is a most unsuitable expression in a country whose people are less formal and more casual. (Judgment of Supreme Full Judgment
HASMAT ALI VERSUS AMINA BIBI & ORS.
Rajendra Kumar Raikwar vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Law laid down - 1. Compassionate employment is not an alternate method of public employment but the same is given solely on humanitarian grounds with the sole object to provide immediate relief to the employee’s family to tide over the sudden financial crisis and the same cannot be claimed as a matter of right. 2. Compassionate appointment cannot be claimed as a matter of right as it is not a vested right and the policy prevailing at the time of death, would Full Judgment