Judgments
M/S BDR DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. VERSUS NARSINGH SHAH alias NARSINGH SAH
SWAMI GOVERDHAN RANGACHARIJI & ORS VERSUS M/S A.J. PRINTERS
Re Suo Motu cognizance taken by the Court vide order dated 01.03.2021 Vs. The State of Bihar
Rajendra Singh Vs. State of M.P. & Ors
Law laid down:- 1. The power of confiscation is not available to be exercised by the Collector in cases of illegal transportation of sand registered under the 2019 Sand Rules. 2. The power of confiscation in cases of illegal transportation of sand registered under 2019 Sand Rules, cannot be borrowed from the repealed 1996 Rules, 2006 Rules or 2018 Sand Rules. 3. The expression “Transgress” found in repealing Clause in Rule 27 of 2019 Sand Rules, defined and interpreted to mean that to Full Judgment
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. VERSUS UTTAM SINGH
Abhishek Chouhan s/o Kailash Chouhan vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - 1. It is held that, in majority of the cases of rape, the defence of the accused is that the prosecutrix was a consenting party and in most of the cases the accused gets the benefit of doubt also, but in the considered opinion of this Court, barring some exceptions, India are a conservative society, it has not yet reached such level (advance or lower) of civilization where unmarried girls, regardless of their religion, indulge in carnal Full Judgment
BANKA SNEHA SHEELA VERSUS THE STATE OF TELANGANA & ORS.
Rajinder Goel vs. High Court of Punjab and Haryana & Anr.
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), KOLKATA VERSUS BATANAGAR EDUCATION AND RESEARCH TRUST
INDRA DEO GARG VERSUS DIVINE INFRACON PVT. LIMITED THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
MRS RITA DABAS VERSUS DIVINE INFRACON PVT. LIMITED THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
MRS. NAVITA SUHAG VERSUS DIVINE INFRACON PVT. LIMITED THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
SULPHUR MILLS LIMITED VERSUS DHARAMAJ CROP GUARD LIMITED AND ANR
Radheshyam vs. Kamla Devi & Others
Law laid down - (1) Under Section 112 of Indian Evidence Act birth during marriage, is conclusive proof of legitimacy, therefore bars DNA testing but when blood relation of siblings is being challenged, there shall be no bar under Section 112 of Indian Evidence Act. Full Judgment
Raghuram @ Raghoram vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - (1) Dying Declaration recorded by Doctor – The wife of appellant was burnt 100% and she was conscious and oriented but her condition was grim. It was natural for Doctor to undertake the task of recording dying declaration himself in view of precarious condition..... Para 26 Citation relied upon – Abdul Majid Abdul Rehman, AIR 1976 SC 1782. (2) Appellant's subsequent conduct relevant under Section 8 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Para 30. Full Judgment