Judgments
SH. SURENDER KUMAR VERSUS NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
SHREE VIJAYA FABRICS THR VIMLAWANTI MANCHANDA VERSUS SHIVANI KHANNA & ANR
SURESH SIVANANDAN VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
D.K. AGRAWAL Vs. COUNCIL OF THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA
Union of India through Narcotics Control Bureau, Lucknow Versus Md. Nawaz Khan
DLF Home Developers Limited VERSUS Rajapura Homes Private Limited & Anr.
Dilip Sisodia vs. State of M.P. and others
Law laid down - 1. Section 3 of National Security Act, 1980 (NSA Act) – Petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India – Challenge to the order of detention at preexecution stage – Scope is limited and can be called in question if (i) that the impugned order is not passed under the Act under which it is purported to have been passed, (ii) that it is sought to be executed against the wrong person, (iii) that it is Full Judgment
SRI MARTHANDA VARMA (D) TH. LRS. & ORS. VERSUS STATE OF KERALA & ORS.
NAGRIK UPBHOKTA MARGDARSHAK MANCH THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT DR. P.G. NAJPANDE AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS
AMRITA PRITAM & ORS VERSUS S S MOTA SINGH JUNIOR MODEL SCHOOL & ORS
ARJUN INDUSTRIES VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICES TAX & ORS
ASHOK KUMAR AGGARWAL VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER
Kirat Lodhi Vs State of Madhya Pradesh & others
Law laid down - (1). Writ Petition challenging the acquisition proceeding under the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 cannot be entertained after lapse of sufficient time and can be dismissed on ground of delay and laches – Notification under Section 11 of the Act, 2013 was issued in the year 2018 and pursuant thereto, the award was passed on 05.03.2020, but challenging the said acquisition proceeding, the writ petition Full Judgment