Judgments
(1) Smt. Guddi Rawat (2) Virendra Rawat Versus State of MP
Law laid down - (1) As Section 306 of IPC makes abatement of commission of suicide punishable, therefore, for making a person liable for an offence punishable under Section 306 IPC, it is a duty of the prosecution to establish that such person has abated the commission of suicide and for the purpose of determining the act of the accused it is necessary to see that his act must fall in any of the 3 categories as enumerated under Section 107 of Full Judgment
PRUTHIVIRAJ JAYANTIBHAI VANOL Vs. DINESH DAYABHAI VALA AND OTHERS
Smt. Indira Chaurasia (deceased) through LRs vs. Director, Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti & others
Law laid down - (1) Where dispute exists between plaintiff and Krishi Upaj Mandi with regard to boundary wall and no any agricultural land is involved, therefore no relief could be sought against the State and provisions of Order 6 Rule 4(a) of CPC shall not be attracted. Full Judgment
Vice Chancellor Anand Agriculture University Versus Kanubhai Nanubhai Vaghela and Anr.
Arvind Kumar Tiwari & Ors. Versus The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
M/s. Dyna Chem Proprietor Mahesh Kumar Punjabi Versus Jaipaldas Punjabi
Law laid down - (1) By no stretch of imagination can it be said that if the two suits are consolidated, it would save valuable time and energy of the court and the parties because in the suit for eviction, only judgement is to be declared whereas in the suit of declaration the entire evidence is still to be led by the parties which is likely to take sufficiently long time in the present scenario of COVID-19. In the considered opinion Full Judgment
JS & ANR VERSUS CENTRAL ADOPTION RESOURCE AUTHORITY & ANR
RAHUL KUMAR VERSUS THE EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
RAJ SUJAN & ANR VERSUS MS GEAR UP BUILDERS PVT LTD & ORS
Praveen Garg vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and two others
M/S. SUPREME BHIWANDI WADA MANOR INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
M/S ORATOR MARKETING PVT. LTD. VERSUS M/S SAMTEX DESINZ PVT. LTD.
State of M.P. Vs. Nandu @ Nandkishore Gupta
Saroj Dehariya Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Law Laid Down:- The intention behind enacting the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 as well as the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 is to give a succour to those upon whom the destiny has inflicted various kinds of disabilities and to provide them an opportunity to participate in the social milieu like any other able bodied person. Despite progressive steps taken by the Courts and the initiatives taken by the Government, the Full Judgment