Judgments
TAPASYA SHIKSHA SAMITI VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
UNIVABS SLEEPERS PVT. LTD. VERSUS MINISTRY OF RAILWAY & ORS
RIPUDAMAN SINGH VERSUS TIKKA MAHESHWAR CHAND
ASSOCIATION OF MD PHYSICIANS VERSUS NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS
DR. DIBYENDU MAZUMDAR VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS
SWASTIK PIPE LTD. VERSUS SHRI RAM AUTOTECH PVT. LTD.
Babban Singh @ Daddan Singh Vs. The State Of Bihar
Ex.S.I.(GD) Yaduvir Singh Bisht Versus National Insurance Company Limited
State of M.P. Vs. Anil Sharma and others
Ashok Vs. Smt. Gyan
Law laid down - Compliance of under Order 21 Rule 34 of CPC. 8. ...............So far as the compliance of Order 21 Rule 34 of CPC is concerned, it was necessary, had there been no representation at all in the Executing Court, however, when the order-sheet itself reveals that the judgment debtor appeared before the Court through her Counsel Shri Ratnesh Pal on 04.10.2019, and thereafter vanished from the scene, there is no point in again sending a notice to the judgment Full Judgment
Curewin Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. vs. Curewin Hylico Pharma Pvt. Ltd.
Law laid down - 1) Section 12-A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 - The provision is clear and unambiguous that a suit which is not pregnant with any such interim relief under the act cannot be instituted unless the plaintiff exhausts the remedy of pre-institutional mediation (para no.11). 2) Section 12-A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 - The purpose of insertion of section 12-A is to encourage the parties to try and resolve their disputes amicably in mediation process. But Commercial Court Full Judgment