Judgments
Bherulal Versus Central Government
Law laid down - Applicability of bar as provided under Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 in case of application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Admittedly, the provisions of the Act have harsher provisions for sentencing and even harsher when it comes to bail, as has been provided under Section 37 of the Act. In the case of Murleedharan v. State of Kerala, while dealing with a similar provision, Section 41-A of Full Judgment
ANIL BANSAL & ORS VERSUS RAJENDER KUMAR RETURNING OFFICER & ORS
ASHWANI KUMAR SHARMA VERSUS BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED
BIRU RAM & ANR VERSUS NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
CLARKS FUTURE FOOTWEAR PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE & ORS
HERO FINCORP. LIMITED VERSUS HEMA AUTOMOTIVE PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS
LAKSHMI NARAYAN SAHU VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
MS MANIKA BATRA VERSUS TABLE TENNIS FEDERATION OF INDIA THROUGH THE PRESIDENT & ORS
M/S NIKHIL INFRATECH LTD. & ORS VERSUS M/S INTEC CAPITAL LTD.
RAJNEESH KUMAR & ORS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS
S.P. SINGLA CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN SERVICES, UTTAR PRADESH JAL NIGAM
SH. SURENDER KUMAR VERSUS NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
SHREE VIJAYA FABRICS THR VIMLAWANTI MANCHANDA VERSUS SHIVANI KHANNA & ANR
SURESH SIVANANDAN VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
D.K. AGRAWAL Vs. COUNCIL OF THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA
Union of India through Narcotics Control Bureau, Lucknow Versus Md. Nawaz Khan
DLF Home Developers Limited VERSUS Rajapura Homes Private Limited & Anr.
Dilip Sisodia vs. State of M.P. and others
Law laid down - 1. Section 3 of National Security Act, 1980 (NSA Act) – Petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India – Challenge to the order of detention at preexecution stage – Scope is limited and can be called in question if (i) that the impugned order is not passed under the Act under which it is purported to have been passed, (ii) that it is sought to be executed against the wrong person, (iii) that it is Full Judgment