Judgments
THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. VERSUS MADAN LAL BATRA & ORS
Mahip Kumar Rawat Versus Shri Ashwini Kumar Rai & Ors.
Law laid down:- (i) Concept of award of back wages is based on the fundamental principle of compensating the workman for the period he remained unemployed owing to termination which was found to be unlawful at subsequent point of time. Thus, the back wages, if to be worked out based on wages, it would have been drawn by the workman till he actually reinstated; (ii) Any contrary approach to back wages after reinstatement would be opposed to the principle of Public Policy Full Judgment
SAMIR KUMAR DAS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
VINOD KUMAR KATARIA VERSUS UOI AND ORS
Prosecutrix (Minor) through her Natural Guardian Vs. State of M.P. and others
Nirmal Lohiya Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Chamru Sai Yadav Versus State of Chhattisgarh
Gurusharan Sahu Versus Chumman Lal Sinha
Gyan Singh Versus Versus South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. and Ors
SAROJ KUMAR NAYAK & ORS VERSUS TRIBAL COOPERATIVE MARKETING DEVELOPMENT FEDERATION ON INDIA LIMITED
Narad Tamrakar Versus State of Chhattisgarh
Panchu Ram Thakur Versus State of Chhattisgarh
Smt. Neelam Dewangan Versus State of Chhattisgarh
Abhay Nigam & Others Vs. Union of India & Others
Law laid down - The Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002 - Section 5 – Attachment of Property – The attachment order passed by Competent Authority in exercise of power under Section 5 is tentative/provisional in nature. Thus, the “reason to believe” in passing such order is also provisional in nature subject to its confirmation by the “adjudicating authority”. Section 8 of The Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002 – The adjudicating authority is under a statutory obligation to examine the complaint Full Judgment