Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
Criminal Revision, 1813
of 2020, Judgment Date: Jan 08, 2021
Law laid down -
1. The order dated 23.3.2020 of Supreme Court related to extension of time limit, was not applicable for filing the challan within 60 days or 90 days as prescribed under CrPC.
2. Order upon the application filed for default bail under section 167(2) of CrPC is not an interlocutory order because it decided the valuable right of default bail finally at that stage. Therefore, revision is tenable against the aforesaid order.
3. (i) Period for filing the challan will Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
WRIT PETITION, 12461
of 2017, Judgment Date: Jan 08, 2021
Law laid down -
If the Disciplinary Authority proceeds under Rule 14 of the M.P. Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1966, then it does not mean that the Authority can only impose major penalty, but it can be culminate into a minor penalty too. Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
Misc. Appeal, 6597
of 2019, Judgment Date: Jan 08, 2021
Law laid down -
Evidence Act with strict technicalities is not applicable in mutation proceedings. Revenue Officer is only required to do enquiry to reach satisfaction in respect of evidence filed regarding acquisition of rights over land. Examination on oath and cross-examination need not be done by Tehsildar in mutation proceedings. Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
W.P.(C), 5454
of 2020, Judgment Date: Jan 08, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CRL.A., 271
of 2017, Judgment Date: Jan 08, 2021
Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
CRMP->CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION, 582
of 2012, Judgment Date: Jan 08, 2021
Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
CRA->CRIMINAL APPEAL, 914
of 2020, Judgment Date: Jan 08, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 51
of 2021, Judgment Date: Jan 07, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CRL.A., 969
of 2019, Judgment Date: Jan 07, 2021
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Criminal Appeal, 1066
of 1998, Judgment Date: Jan 07, 2021
Law laid down -
(1) Section 302, 120B and Section 201 of IPC : Vikki Bai was not traceable from matrimonial house and hence her father-in-law lodged "Gum Insaan" report in Police Station. Father of Vikki Bai also lodged the report that she is murdered by appellants. Body or remains of Vikki Bai could never be traced. The court below held the appellants as guilty on the basis of circumstantial evidence.
Held : Conclusion of guilt must be based on circumstances Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 14665
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2021
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION, 131281,131288
of 2019, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
W.P.(C), 11243
of 2020, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
W.P.(C), 89
of 2021, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
W.P.(C), 9256
of 2020, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CRL.A., 313
of 2017, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
W.P.(C), 10874
of 2020, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CS(COMM), 565
of 2018, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CRL.REV.P., 329
of 2020, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
W.P.(C), 106
of 2021, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2021
Full Judgment
