Latest Judgments of Supreme Court of India and M.P High Court.

Law Laid down - The Madhya Pradesh Bhumigat Pipe Line, Cable Evam Duct (Bhumi Ki Upyokta Ke Adhikaron Ka Arjan) Adhiniyam, 2012” [for short the ‘State Act’] is an Act enacted in pursuance of Entry 5, 6 and 17 of List II, of the 7th Schedule, and not in terms of Entry 43 of List III of the 7th Schedule. Therefore, the State Act is not repugnant to the The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Full Judgment

Tags Land Acquisition

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Balwan Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others

WRIT PETITION, 21225 of 2016, Judgment Date: May 08, 2018

Law laid down - "Whether the power of recounting can be delegated- Held- No. "Whether the application for recounting should contain specific reasons for recounting as per Rule 80 of the Election Rules- Held- Yes. Full Judgment

Tags Panchayat Election

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

A.K. Hade Vs. Shailendra Singh Yadav and another

MCRC, 2629 of 2012, Judgment Date: May 07, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Quashing Of Complaint/ Orders

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Visnushankar (since dead) and others Vs. Girdharilal and others

FA, 509 of 2002, Judgment Date: May 04, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Decree

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

MOHANLAL GARG AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANOTHER

WRIT PETITION, 4145 of 2017, Judgment Date: May 04, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Property Disputes

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

AMEET LALCHAND SHAH AND OTHERS Versus RISHABH ENTERPRISES AND ANOTHER

Appeal (Civil), 690 of 2018, Judgment Date: May 03, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Arbitration

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/s Eureka Builders & Ors Versus Gulabchand s/o Veljee Dand Since Deceased by L.Rs. & Ors.Etc.Etc

Appeal (Civil), 4757-4760 of 2018, Judgment Date: May 03, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Property Disputes

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

RACHIT SINHA & ORS. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Writ Petition (Civil), 357 of 2018, Judgment Date: May 03, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Education

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

RICHAL & ORS. ETC.ETC. VERSUS RAJASTHAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS. ETC. ETC.

Appeal (Civil), 46954699 of 2018, Judgment Date: May 03, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Appointment Condonation Of Delay

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

Shri Gouri Ganesh Shri Balaji Constructions “C” Class Contractor Vs. Executive Engineer, PWD

Arbitration Case, 40 of 2016, Judgment Date: May 03, 2018

Law Laid Down - The expression “ascertained amount” appearing in Section 2(1)(d) of the M.P. Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 (for short “the State Act”) includes the amount of consequential relief. Mere declaration of termination of contract is not the substantial relief and in the guise of mere declaration an aggrieved person cannot be permitted to omit the consequential relief which the party may be entitled to claim in a reference under the M.P. Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983. It is held that reading of Full Judgment

Tags Arbitration