Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
W.P.(C), 11098
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jan 27, 2018
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
ARB.A., 21
of 2017, Judgment Date: Jan 27, 2018
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CRL.M.C., 873
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 27, 2018
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 4741
of 2007, Judgment Date: Jan 25, 2018
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1224
of 2008, Judgment Date: Jan 25, 2018
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 4189
of 2007, Judgment Date: Jan 25, 2018
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 3018
of 2008, Judgment Date: Jan 25, 2018
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1676
of 2009, Judgment Date: Jan 25, 2018
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 881
of 2018, Judgment Date: Jan 25, 2018
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 873874
of 2018, Judgment Date: Jan 25, 2018
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
WA, 613
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 25, 2018
Law Laid Down -
The context in which other judgments are rendered interpreting a word appearing in a statute are not relevant for the purpose of the Madhya Pradesh Shaskiya Sevak (Adhivarshiki-Ayu) Adhiniyam, 1967. The provisions of the Act, as amended by Madhya Pradesh Shaskiya Sevak (Adhivarshiki-Ayu) Dwitiya Sanshodhan Adhiniyam, 1998 are required to be interpreted keeping in view the language, context, object and purpose of the Statute in question.
The amendments in the Act so as to extend the age is Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
FA, 169
of 2003, Judgment Date: Jan 25, 2018
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
WRIT PETITION, 22357
of 2017, Judgment Date: Jan 25, 2018
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Criminal Appeal, 2504
of 2008, Judgment Date: Jan 25, 2018
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Criminal Appeal, 512
of 1995, Judgment Date: Jan 24, 2018
Law laid down -
(I) If, in presence of the accused at his house something wrong has happened with his wife, then in view of Section 106 of the Evidence Act, he is under burden to give a cogent explanation as to how the crime was committed.
(II) Conviction can be based on circumstantial evidence. Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 161
of 2018, Judgment Date: Jan 23, 2018
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 824
of 2018, Judgment Date: Jan 23, 2018
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 165
of 2018, Judgment Date: Jan 23, 2018
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Miscellaneous Petition(Civil), 1795-1796
of 2017, Judgment Date: Jan 22, 2018
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
MCRC, 27144
of 2017, Judgment Date: Jan 22, 2018
Full Judgment
