Judgments
Jagdish Valecha Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors.
Caparo Engineering India Ltd Vs. Pradhanmantri Engineering Shramik Sanghthan
S.N. Vijaywargiya Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Law Laid Down - In terms of Section 170(1) of the CrPC, the Investigating Agency is mandated to produce an accused in custody for the non-bailable offence. The argument that the Court should have issued summons in respect of such offence stands rejected. An order dated 20.10.2016 of a Single Bench of this Court in MCRC No.17501/2016 (Rajendra Kori vs. State of Madhya Pradesh) - is overruled. Accused has no right to insist upon investigation by a particular agency – whether State Full Judgment
State of M.P. Vs. Natwar and others
Arun Kumar Pandey Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Others
Law laid down - ➢ Merely registration of the FIR and offence by the Lokayukt Establishment would not debar the petitioner because the judicial proceedings have not deemed to be instituted on the date of attaining the age of superannuation by the petitioner. ➢ The Governor is having the right to withhold or withdraw the pension or part thereof in the contingencies specified in Rule 9(1), in case an employee is found guilty of grave misconduct or negligence committed by him during the Full Judgment
NARESH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF DELHI
HARI RAM & ANR Vs. REGISTRAR GENERAL, DELHI HIGH COURT
Nitin Singhal Vs. Purushottam Chugh & Another
MAHESH KUMAR Vs. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS
DALIP SINGH Vs. STATE
In Reference Received from Second Addl. Sessions Judge, Chhatarpur Vs. Bhagchandra
Bhagchandra Vs State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - (i) Evidence of related eye-witnesses can be relied upon for conviction. (ii) Non-compliance of Section 157 of Cr.P.C. cannot prove fatal for the prosecution if the case is duly established against the accused. (iii) Keeping in view the heinous and brutal nature of murder of more than one person, now-a-days death sentence is essential. Full Judgment