Judgments
Vishwanath Singh Vs. State of M.P. and others
Law Laid Down - S.52 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 – in absence of seizure of forest produce or its Panchanama, entire confiscation proceedings initiated in respect of vehicle cannot be allowed to sustain. Full Judgment
M/s Uttarakhand Purv Sainik Kalyan Nigam Limited Vs. Northern Coal Field Limited
Law Laid Down - * Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 deals with the appointment of Arbitrator without the intervention of the Court whereas appointment with the intervention of the Court is contemplated under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act. * The limitation for filing a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act is contemplated by the Limitation Act particularly Article 137 of the Schedule-I of the Limitation Act, 1963. The limitation does not start from the notice but Full Judgment
M/s Mangalam Homes & Resorts Pvt.Ltd.& Ors. Versus Joy Kaliyavumkal & Anr. Etc.
I.C. Sharma Versus The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.
THE SECRETARY, KERALA STATE COASTAL MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY VERSUS DLF UNIVERSAL LIMITED & ORS.
Baiju @ Vijay Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Sudeep Patel Vs. State of M.P. and others
Law Laid Down - Parity between the preventive detention and the externment proceedings. Reliance is placed on the case of State of Maharashtra and others v. Bhaurao Punjabrao Gawande, (2008) 3 SCC 613. Full Judgment
Shiv Pratap Singh Tomar Vs. Smt. Seema Tomar and Others
Law laid down - (I) A defendant may cross-examine a co-defendant or any other witness who has given evidence against him, and reply on such evidence though there is no issue joined between them. (II) Once it is demonstrated by a defendant that his interest is not common and there is a conflict of interest affecting the interest of co-defendant then the defendant can cross-examine the witnesses of co-defendant for reaching to the truth. (III) Condition precedent for giving an opportunity to a Full Judgment
Shiv Narayan and others Versus State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - (i) Even after acquittal of the charge under section 302 read with section 149 IPC, the remaining accused can be convicted under section 302 IPC without there being separate charge u/s 302 IPC. The same is a curable irregularity. (ii) To claim the right of self defence, there must be real danger to life or grievous hurt. Full Judgment