Judgments
Chhindwara Plus Developers Limited - V/s - Union of India & Others
The provisions of Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 will not have overriding effect over the provision of the Electricity Act, 2003 or for that matter the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, as they are not inconsistent with the provisions of the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 as none of the provisions of the SEZ Act deal with the erection of transmission lines which is part of the Electricity Act read with Telegraph Act. Therefore, it cannot be said that the provisions Full Judgment
Ramanda @ Yashvant Gond -Vs- State of Madhya Pradesh
Shankar Gadariya -Vs- State of Madhya Pradesh
Amit Negi Vs. State Of U.P. & 2 Others
SUKHWINDER KUMAR & ORS. Versus STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.
PURVI MUKESH GADA VERSUS MUKESH POPATLAL GADA & ANR.
BANSAL PLYWOOD Vs. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS.
JALIWALI MASJID AND ARABI MADARSA, MUMBAI Vs HAJI ABDUL RAZZAQUE HAJI AHMED CHHAPRA, MUMBAI AND OTHERS
RAJU @ AHMED ISMAIL SAYYED (C-4739) Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Defence Estate Officer, Agra Vs. Sri Santosh Sharma And 2 Others
DHRUBA KUMAR SAHA & ANR. VS aR.N. SINGH & 3 ORS.
THE STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH & 4 ORS. VS M/S TAMA FABRICATION WORKS & ANR.
Nitin Pathak - V/s - State of M.P. & Others
(1) In exercise of power of Judicial Review, the Court should not refer the matter to court appointed expert as the courts have a very limited role particularly when no mala fides have been alleged against the experts constituted to finalize answer key. It would normally be prudent, wholesome and safe for the courts to leave the decisions to the academicians and experts. (2) Secondly this Court does not and should not act as Court of Appeal in the matter of Full Judgment