Judgments
SYED IQBAL SYED AZIZ Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PSO PARATWADA TQ ACHALPUR DISTT AMRAVATI
J. Vasanthi & Ors. VERSUS N. Ramani Kanthammal (D) Rep. by LRs. & Ors.
Union of India and Ors. Versus Ex LAC Nallam Shiva
To put it differently, in the fact situation of the present case, it is not possible to hold that the punishment of dismissal was vindictive, unduly harsh or disproportionate to the offence committed by the respondent and especially after the Tribunal has positively concluded that failure of the respondent to communicate either to his unit or to the nearest military stationf or around 1½ years was uncondonable. Ordinarily, the Tribunal ought not to interfere with the order of punishment except Full Judgment
ANAND KUMAR Vs. THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA & ANR
NAVEEN BHATIA (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRs Vs. RAJ KUMARI BHATIA AND ORS.
K. NAVEEN KUMAR VERSUS COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER & ANR.
MEGHA TECHNICAL & ENGINEERS (PVT.) LTD. VS THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
NAVEEN KUMAR CHAUDHURY VS SIMRAT KAUR PHULL
ABDUS SALAM TAPADAR & ANR. VS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
BABAR ROAD COLONY LEASE HOLDER ASSOCIATION Vs. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS
Ideal Carpets Ltd. V E R S U S Union of India & others
Vasant Rao Guhe VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh
Trial Court on the two major heads of income i.e. pay and agricultural earnings, the learned Trial Court not only of its own embarked on an inquiry to ascertain and compute the figures, it wholly resorted to inferences in calculating the pay for the periods omitted by the prosecution as well as in fixing 60% expenditure from pay towards household needs. Its assessment of agricultural income of the appellant to say the least is also wholly presumptive in absence of Full Judgment