Judgments
M/s Sunil Steels Prop Versus State of Chhattisgarh
M/s Sunil Steels Prop Versus State of Chhattisgarh Full Judgment
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS. Vs. SHAIK MAHIBULLA SHARIEF
EX. GNR LAXMANRAM POONIA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Pradhuman Verma Vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh Thr
PARYAVARAN SURAKSHA SAMITI & ANR Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Dr. Ajay Chandrawat & Ors. v. State of M.P. & Anr.
SATISH KUMAR GUPTA AND ETC. ETC. Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC.
MANUARA KHATUN & ORS. Vs. RAJESH KR. SINGH & ORS.
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON LONDON BRANCH Vs. ZENITH INFOTECH LIMITED
Rakesh Vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
Subhash Chandra Sharma & Ors. v. State of M.P. & Ano.
JAGMAL & ORS. Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
PRABHAKARA ADIGA Vs. GOWRI AND ORS
Singular question involved in the matter is executability of decree for permanent injunction against the legal representatives of judgment- debtor. It is crystal clear from a perusal of section 50(2) CPC that a decree for permanent injunction can be executed against the judgment debtor or his legal representatives. Normally personal action dies with person but this principle has application to limited kinds of causes of actions. In our considered opinion the Full Judgment
BHIKAN SK.NOOR MOHD Vs. MEHAMOODABEE SK.AFZAL & ORS.
Narendra Pandey Vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh Thr
Managing Director Vs State Of M.P.
Thus, as the Marico Industries Limited, Mumbai has not been arraigned as an accused, therefore, the prosecution of the applicant in his official capacity is not permissible because he cannot be vicariously held liable for the offence committed by the Company unless and until, the Company which is a juristic entity is arraigned as an accused. Full Judgment